Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality

  • Paul Yaswen
  • , Karen L. MacKenzie
  • , W. Nicol Keith
  • , Patricia Hentosh
  • , Francis Rodier
  • , Jiyue Zhu
  • , Gary L. Firestone
  • , Ander Matheu
  • , Amancio Carnero
  • , Alan Bilsland
  • , Tabetha Sundin
  • , Kanya Honoki
  • , Hiromasa Fujii
  • , Alexandros G. Georgakilas
  • , Amedeo Amedei
  • , Amr Amin
  • , Bill Helferich
  • , Chandra S. Boosani
  • , Gunjan Guha
  • , Maria Rosa Ciriolo
  • Sophie Chen, Sulma I. Mohammed, Asfar S. Azmi, Dipita Bhakta, Dorota Halicka, Elena Niccolai, Katia Aquilano, S. Salman Ashraf, Somaira Nowsheen, Xujuan Yang
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • Children's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research
  • University of Glasgow
  • Old Dominion University
  • University Montreal
  • Washington State University College of Pharmacy
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • Biodonostia Institute
  • Universidad de Sevilla
  • Sentara Healthcare
  • Nara Medical University
  • National Technical University of Athens
  • University of Florence
  • United Arab Emirates University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
  • Creighton University
  • SASTRA University
  • Università di Roma II 'Tor Vergata' and Sezione INFN
  • Ovarian and Prostate Cancer Research Trust Laboratory
  • Purdue University
  • Wayne State University
  • New York Medical College
  • Mayo Clinic

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of malignant cell populations is the ability to undergo continuous proliferation. This property allows clonal lineages to acquire sequential aberrations that can fuel increasingly autonomous growth, invasiveness, and therapeutic resistance. Innate cellular mechanisms have evolved to regulate replicative potential as a hedge against malignant progression. When activated in the absence of normal terminal differentiation cues, these mechanisms can result in a state of persistent cytostasis. This state, termed "senescence," can be triggered by intrinsic cellular processes such as telomere dysfunction and oncogene expression, and by exogenous factors such as DNA damaging agents or oxidative environments. Despite differences in upstream signaling, senescence often involves convergent interdependent activation of tumor suppressors p53 and p16/pRB, but can be induced, albeit with reduced sensitivity, when these suppressors are compromised. Doses of conventional genotoxic drugs required to achieve cancer cell senescence are often much lower than doses required to achieve outright cell death. Additional therapies, such as those targeting cyclin dependent kinases or components of the PI3K signaling pathway, may induce senescence specifically in cancer cells by circumventing defects in tumor suppressor pathways or exploiting cancer cells' heightened requirements for telomerase. Such treatments sufficient to induce cancer cell senescence could provide increased patient survival with fewer and less severe side effects than conventional cytotoxic regimens. This positive aspect is countered by important caveats regarding senescence reversibility, genomic instability, and paracrine effects that may increase heterogeneity and adaptive resistance of surviving cancer cells. Nevertheless, agents that effectively disrupt replicative immortality will likely be valuable components of new combinatorial approaches to cancer therapy.

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)S104-S128
JournalSeminars in Cancer Biology
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Oncogenic stress
  • P53
  • PRB
  • Senescence
  • Telomerase

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this