TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainability criteria as a game changer in the search for hybrid solvents for CO2 and H2S removal
AU - Alkhatib, Ismail I.I.
AU - Khalifa, Omar
AU - Bahamon, Daniel
AU - Abu Zahra, Mohammad
AU - Vega, Lourdes F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Khalifa University of Science and Technology through project RC2-2019-007. Computational resources from the Research and Innovation Center on CO 2 and Hydrogen (RICH Center) and the HPC at Khalifa University are gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/12/15
Y1 - 2021/12/15
N2 - The appearance of hybrid solvents in recent years introduced a potential replacement for aqueous amines for acid gas removal in order to mainly overcome the high energy of regeneration. Yet, the assessment of solvent potentiality remains haphazard with limited information and assessment criteria. In this contribution, we develop and apply a multi-criteria assessment approach built on the use of a molecular-based equation of state, namely, polar soft-SAFT, in combination with sustainability indicators to examine the performance of hybrid solvents for acid gas removal (CO2 and H2S). The first stage of the approach relies on the robust development of the thermodynamic model with available experimental data. Subsequently, with assured fidelity, the model is used in a fully predictive manner to obtain relevant assessment criteria for technical performance evaluation. This is inclusive of standard key performance indicators such as cyclic capacity and energy of regeneration, along with key solvent properties at conditions representative of acid gas removal processes. Additionally, we examine the environmental, health and safety impact of the investigated solvents as a sustainability criteria to select them. This framework has been applied for the first time to six solvents for acid gas removal, including the benchmark solvents aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) and aqueous diethanolamine (DEA), along with hybrid solvents formulated from chemical solvents such as MEA, or DEA, with physical co-solvents including N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), or sulfolane (SFL). The results of the multi-criteria assessment demonstrate that among the six solvents investigated in this work, the overall best performer remains to be the benchmark aqueous MEA. Results also indicate the potentiality of MEA + NMP hybrid solvent in terms of an acceptable compromise between reduced absorption capability and reduced energy of regeneration, compared to aqueous MEA; however, the hybrid solvents fail when applying the sustainability metrics. This work clearly indicates that potential solvents for acid gas removal should be examined following a holistic approach, inclusive of their technical performance and environmental footprint.
AB - The appearance of hybrid solvents in recent years introduced a potential replacement for aqueous amines for acid gas removal in order to mainly overcome the high energy of regeneration. Yet, the assessment of solvent potentiality remains haphazard with limited information and assessment criteria. In this contribution, we develop and apply a multi-criteria assessment approach built on the use of a molecular-based equation of state, namely, polar soft-SAFT, in combination with sustainability indicators to examine the performance of hybrid solvents for acid gas removal (CO2 and H2S). The first stage of the approach relies on the robust development of the thermodynamic model with available experimental data. Subsequently, with assured fidelity, the model is used in a fully predictive manner to obtain relevant assessment criteria for technical performance evaluation. This is inclusive of standard key performance indicators such as cyclic capacity and energy of regeneration, along with key solvent properties at conditions representative of acid gas removal processes. Additionally, we examine the environmental, health and safety impact of the investigated solvents as a sustainability criteria to select them. This framework has been applied for the first time to six solvents for acid gas removal, including the benchmark solvents aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) and aqueous diethanolamine (DEA), along with hybrid solvents formulated from chemical solvents such as MEA, or DEA, with physical co-solvents including N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), or sulfolane (SFL). The results of the multi-criteria assessment demonstrate that among the six solvents investigated in this work, the overall best performer remains to be the benchmark aqueous MEA. Results also indicate the potentiality of MEA + NMP hybrid solvent in terms of an acceptable compromise between reduced absorption capability and reduced energy of regeneration, compared to aqueous MEA; however, the hybrid solvents fail when applying the sustainability metrics. This work clearly indicates that potential solvents for acid gas removal should be examined following a holistic approach, inclusive of their technical performance and environmental footprint.
KW - Acid gas removal
KW - CO2 capture and separation
KW - Multi-criteria assessment
KW - Polar soft-SAFT
KW - Sustainable solvents
KW - Water-free solvents
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85113394734
U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119516
DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119516
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113394734
SN - 1383-5866
VL - 277
JO - Separation and Purification Technology
JF - Separation and Purification Technology
M1 - 119516
ER -