TY - GEN
T1 - Strategic Federated Learning
T2 - 32nd European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2024
AU - Hassan, M.
AU - Zhang, C.
AU - Lasaulce, Samson
AU - Varma, V. S.
AU - Debbah, M.
AU - Ghogho, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Federated learning (FL) involves several clients that share with a fusion center (FC), the model each client has trained with its own data. Conventional FL, which can be interpreted as an estimation or distortion-based approach, ignores the final use of model information (MI) by the FC and the other clients. In this paper, we introduce a novel FL framework in which the FC uses an aggregate version of the MI to make decisions that affect the client’s utility functions. Clients cannot choose the decisions and can only use the MI reported to the FC to maximize their utility. Depending on the alignment between the client and FC utilities, the client may have an individual interest in adding strategic noise to the model. This general framework is stated and specialized to the case of clustering, in which noisy cluster representative information is reported. This is applied to the problem of power consumption scheduling. In this context, utility non-alignment occurs, for instance, when the client wants to consume when the price of electricity is low, whereas the FC wants the consumption to occur when the total power is the lowest. This is illustrated with aggregated real data from Ausgrid [1].
AB - Federated learning (FL) involves several clients that share with a fusion center (FC), the model each client has trained with its own data. Conventional FL, which can be interpreted as an estimation or distortion-based approach, ignores the final use of model information (MI) by the FC and the other clients. In this paper, we introduce a novel FL framework in which the FC uses an aggregate version of the MI to make decisions that affect the client’s utility functions. Clients cannot choose the decisions and can only use the MI reported to the FC to maximize their utility. Depending on the alignment between the client and FC utilities, the client may have an individual interest in adding strategic noise to the model. This general framework is stated and specialized to the case of clustering, in which noisy cluster representative information is reported. This is applied to the problem of power consumption scheduling. In this context, utility non-alignment occurs, for instance, when the client wants to consume when the price of electricity is low, whereas the FC wants the consumption to occur when the total power is the lowest. This is illustrated with aggregated real data from Ausgrid [1].
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208427369
U2 - 10.23919/eusipco63174.2024.10714976
DO - 10.23919/eusipco63174.2024.10714976
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85208427369
T3 - European Signal Processing Conference
SP - 1172
EP - 1176
BT - 32nd European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2024 - Proceedings
Y2 - 26 August 2024 through 30 August 2024
ER -