TY - JOUR
T1 - STAR-IOS Aided NOMA Networks
T2 - Channel Model Approximation and Performance Analysis
AU - Zhang, Chao
AU - Yi, Wenqiang
AU - Liu, Yuanwei
AU - Ding, Zhiguo
AU - Song, Lingyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
IEEE
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Compared with the conventional reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), simultaneous transmitting and reflecting intelligent omini-surfaces (STAR-IOSs) are able to achieve 360° coverage “smart radio environments". By splitting the energy or altering the active number of STAR-IOS elements, STAR-IOSs provide high flexibility of successive interference cancellation (SIC) orders for non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems. Based on the aforementioned advantages, this paper investigates a STAR-IOS-aided downlink NOMA network with randomly deployed users. We first propose three tractable channel models for different application scenarios, namely the central limit model, the curve fitting model, and the M-fold convolution model. More specifically, the central limit model fits the scenarios with large-size STAR-IOSs while the curve fitting model is extended to evaluate multi-cell networks. However, these two models cannot obtain accurate diversity orders. Hence, we figure out the M-fold convolution model to derive accurate diversity orders. We consider three protocols for STAR-IOSs, namely, the energy splitting (ES) protocol, the time switching (TS) protocol, and the mode switching (MS) protocol. Based on the ES protocol, we derive closed-form analytical expressions of outage probabilities for the paired NOMA users by the central limit model and the curve fitting model. Based on three STAR-IOS protocols, we derive the diversity gains of NOMA users by the M-fold convolution model. The analytical results reveal that the diversity gain of NOMA users is equal to the active number of STAR-IOS elements. Numerical results indicate that 1) in high signal-to-noise ratio regions, the central limit model performs as an upper bound of the simulation results, while a lower bound is obtained by the curve fitting model; 2) the TS protocol has the best performance but requesting more time blocks than other protocols; 3) the ES protocol outperforms the MS protocol as the ES protocol has higher diversity gains.
AB - Compared with the conventional reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), simultaneous transmitting and reflecting intelligent omini-surfaces (STAR-IOSs) are able to achieve 360° coverage “smart radio environments". By splitting the energy or altering the active number of STAR-IOS elements, STAR-IOSs provide high flexibility of successive interference cancellation (SIC) orders for non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems. Based on the aforementioned advantages, this paper investigates a STAR-IOS-aided downlink NOMA network with randomly deployed users. We first propose three tractable channel models for different application scenarios, namely the central limit model, the curve fitting model, and the M-fold convolution model. More specifically, the central limit model fits the scenarios with large-size STAR-IOSs while the curve fitting model is extended to evaluate multi-cell networks. However, these two models cannot obtain accurate diversity orders. Hence, we figure out the M-fold convolution model to derive accurate diversity orders. We consider three protocols for STAR-IOSs, namely, the energy splitting (ES) protocol, the time switching (TS) protocol, and the mode switching (MS) protocol. Based on the ES protocol, we derive closed-form analytical expressions of outage probabilities for the paired NOMA users by the central limit model and the curve fitting model. Based on three STAR-IOS protocols, we derive the diversity gains of NOMA users by the M-fold convolution model. The analytical results reveal that the diversity gain of NOMA users is equal to the active number of STAR-IOS elements. Numerical results indicate that 1) in high signal-to-noise ratio regions, the central limit model performs as an upper bound of the simulation results, while a lower bound is obtained by the curve fitting model; 2) the TS protocol has the best performance but requesting more time blocks than other protocols; 3) the ES protocol outperforms the MS protocol as the ES protocol has higher diversity gains.
KW - Analytical models
KW - Channel models
KW - Convolution
KW - Intelligent omini-surface
KW - NOMA
KW - non-orthogonal multiple access
KW - Performance analysis
KW - physical layer channel model approximation
KW - Protocols
KW - reconfigurable intelligent surfaces
KW - Switches
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85125705136
U2 - 10.1109/TWC.2022.3152703
DO - 10.1109/TWC.2022.3152703
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125705136
SN - 1536-1276
JO - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
JF - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
ER -