TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-forming Dynamic Membranes for Wastewater Treatment
AU - Millanar-Marfa, Jessa Marie J.
AU - Borea, Laura
AU - Castrogiovanni, Fabiano
AU - Hasan, Shadi Wajih
AU - Choo, Kwang Ho
AU - Korshin, Gregory V.
AU - de Luna, Mark Daniel G.
AU - Ballesteros, Florencio C.
AU - Belgiorno, Vincenzo
AU - Naddeo, Vincenzo
N1 - Funding Information:
The research activities were partially funded by the University of Salerno under Project Nos. ORSA167105 and ORSA15425 and under Project No. IN17GR09/INT/Italy/P-17/2016 (SP) funded by Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India and by Development for Technology (ERDT) through the Department of Science and Technology, Philippines. The authors are grateful to the Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Division (SEED) Laboratory of University of Salerno for providing the facilities and research fund. We also highly acknowledge the University of the Philippines–Diliman and the Engineering Research and Development for Technology (ERDT) through the Department of Science and Technology, Philippines for the Ph.D. Scholarship Grant and Sandwich Program awarded to one of the authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) technology has been gaining significant interest due to its potential advantages, notably lower capital and operational cost and easier fouling control, over conventional membranes used in membrane bioreactors. SFDM technology utilizes inexpensive support material integrated with a dynamic membrane (DM) made of suspended solids and biomass to provide high effluent quality. Objectives: This paper aims to bridge the gap between the previous reviews and the current studies to provide a comprehensive review on SFDM applications to both aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors. Literature review: The historical development of DMs since the 1960s up to the present is presented. Specific attention was given to DM formation mechanisms, deposition time, impacts of design, and operational factors (mesh characteristics and sludge properties) on DM formation and performances and on DM-based integrated systems. Abbreviations: AnDMBR, anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor; CFV,crossflow velocity; COD,chemical oxygen demand; DM,dynamic membrane; DO,dissolved oxygen; EPS,extracellular polymeric substances; F/M,food to microorganisms ratio; HRT,hydraulic retention time; J,flux; MBR,membrane bioreactor; MF,microfiltration; MLSS,mixed liquor suspended solids; PSD,particle size distribution; RO,reverse osmosis; SEM,scanning electron microscopy; SFDM,self-forming dynamic membrane; SMP,soluble microbial products; SRT,sludge retention time; SS,suspended solids; TMP,transmembrane pressure; TN,total nitrogen; TP,total phosphorus; TSS,total suspended solids; UF,ultrafiltration.
AB - Introduction: Self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) technology has been gaining significant interest due to its potential advantages, notably lower capital and operational cost and easier fouling control, over conventional membranes used in membrane bioreactors. SFDM technology utilizes inexpensive support material integrated with a dynamic membrane (DM) made of suspended solids and biomass to provide high effluent quality. Objectives: This paper aims to bridge the gap between the previous reviews and the current studies to provide a comprehensive review on SFDM applications to both aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors. Literature review: The historical development of DMs since the 1960s up to the present is presented. Specific attention was given to DM formation mechanisms, deposition time, impacts of design, and operational factors (mesh characteristics and sludge properties) on DM formation and performances and on DM-based integrated systems. Abbreviations: AnDMBR, anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor; CFV,crossflow velocity; COD,chemical oxygen demand; DM,dynamic membrane; DO,dissolved oxygen; EPS,extracellular polymeric substances; F/M,food to microorganisms ratio; HRT,hydraulic retention time; J,flux; MBR,membrane bioreactor; MF,microfiltration; MLSS,mixed liquor suspended solids; PSD,particle size distribution; RO,reverse osmosis; SEM,scanning electron microscopy; SFDM,self-forming dynamic membrane; SMP,soluble microbial products; SRT,sludge retention time; SS,suspended solids; TMP,transmembrane pressure; TN,total nitrogen; TP,total phosphorus; TSS,total suspended solids; UF,ultrafiltration.
KW - bioreactors
KW - Dynamic membrane
KW - extracellular polymeric substances
KW - flux
KW - membrane fouling
KW - sludge properties
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102937560
U2 - 10.1080/15422119.2021.1887223
DO - 10.1080/15422119.2021.1887223
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85102937560
SN - 1542-2119
VL - 51
SP - 195
EP - 211
JO - Separation and Purification Reviews
JF - Separation and Purification Reviews
IS - 2
ER -
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation