TY - JOUR
T1 - Rooftop rainwater harvesting
T2 - Alleviating water shortages at the household level
AU - Alameddine, Ibrahim
AU - Majzoub, Amani
AU - Najm, Majdi Abou
AU - El-Fadel, Mutasem
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was funded through a program on climate change and sea water intrusion along the Eastern Mediterranean funded by the International Development Research Center (IDRC) of Canada at the American University of Beirut Grant No. 106706‐001. Funding was also provided by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) through a program on managed aquifer recharge to prevent seawater intrusion in Beirut – Lebanon.
Funding Information:
This study was funded through a program on climate change and sea water intrusion along the Eastern Mediterranean funded by the International Development Research Center (IDRC) of Canada at the American University of Beirut Grant No. 106706‐001. Funding was also provided by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) through a program on managed aquifer recharge to prevent seawater intrusion in Beirut - Lebanon.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 WIT Press
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Population growth and development coupled with potential climate change impacts are invariably associated with chronic water shortages particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. In this study, we examined the socioeconomic feasibility of implementing rainwater harvesting systems (RWHS) on building rooftops to alleviate chronic water shortages. Examining the socio-economic factors affecting the willingness of people to participate in such programs, it was found that education and the availability of outdoor space affected the rate of participation positively, while the age of the respondent and the number of floors in a building decreased people's keenness to participate. The cost of harvested rainwater per cubic meter was found to range between $0.16 and $0.28/m3, which compares favourably with the existing public network tariffs ($0.37/m3-$1.4/m3) and provides major savings when compared to the costs associated with different adaptation measures commonly used by residents (reverse osmosis system = $1.36/m3; water tankers = $5.64-10/m3). On average, a household with a monthly income below $1,500 was willing to invest $0.54/m3 in a RWHS compared to $2.34/m3 for those whose monthly income was above $6,000; for both income groups their average reported investment costs represented around 1% of their monthly income. At the economic viability level, a RWHS proved advantageous for a single household with 5 occupants, while harvested quantities for a multi-storey residential building with 50 occupants or more were relatively small in comparison to actual demands. Concerns over the water quality of the harvested rainwater were documented in the study area, with bacterial contamination proving to be a major concern.
AB - Population growth and development coupled with potential climate change impacts are invariably associated with chronic water shortages particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. In this study, we examined the socioeconomic feasibility of implementing rainwater harvesting systems (RWHS) on building rooftops to alleviate chronic water shortages. Examining the socio-economic factors affecting the willingness of people to participate in such programs, it was found that education and the availability of outdoor space affected the rate of participation positively, while the age of the respondent and the number of floors in a building decreased people's keenness to participate. The cost of harvested rainwater per cubic meter was found to range between $0.16 and $0.28/m3, which compares favourably with the existing public network tariffs ($0.37/m3-$1.4/m3) and provides major savings when compared to the costs associated with different adaptation measures commonly used by residents (reverse osmosis system = $1.36/m3; water tankers = $5.64-10/m3). On average, a household with a monthly income below $1,500 was willing to invest $0.54/m3 in a RWHS compared to $2.34/m3 for those whose monthly income was above $6,000; for both income groups their average reported investment costs represented around 1% of their monthly income. At the economic viability level, a RWHS proved advantageous for a single household with 5 occupants, while harvested quantities for a multi-storey residential building with 50 occupants or more were relatively small in comparison to actual demands. Concerns over the water quality of the harvested rainwater were documented in the study area, with bacterial contamination proving to be a major concern.
KW - Rainwater harvesting
KW - Water quality
KW - Willingness to participate
KW - Willingness to pay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077220894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2495/WRM190031
DO - 10.2495/WRM190031
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077220894
SN - 1746-448X
VL - 229
SP - 21
EP - 32
JO - WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
JF - WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
ER -