TY - JOUR
T1 - Reversing membrane wetting in membrane distillation
T2 - Comparing dryout to backwashing with pressurized air
AU - Warsinger, David M.
AU - Servi, Amelia
AU - Connors, Grace B.
AU - Mavukkandy, Musthafa O.
AU - Arafat, Hassan A.
AU - Gleason, Karen K.
AU - Lienhard, John H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Cooperative Agreement between the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology (Masdar University), Abu Dhabi, UAE and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA, Reference No. 02/MI/ MI/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00. We would like to acknowledge contributions by Jocelyn Gonzalez and Margaret Bertoni.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - The critical failure mode for membrane distillation (MD) desalination is wetting through the pores of the hydrophobic membrane, which allows the saline solution to leak through and contaminate the permeate. The standard practice for reversing membrane wetting is to dry out the membrane for several hours before resuming the desalination process. An alternative method for mitigating MD membrane wetting is examined in this study, wherein pressurized air is pushed through the membrane from the permeate side for several seconds, forcing trapped water out before it can evaporate. To compare the wetting reversal methods, the liquid entry pressure (LEP) was surpassed with saline water at varied salinity. Then, either a 24+ hour dryout, a 10 second pressurized air treatment, or both were applied, followed by remeasuring the LEP. Pressurized air backwashing restored the LEP to 75% of the original value for lower salinity feeds. The backwashing method is hypothesized to achieve this superior result because it removes saline solution from the membrane without separating water and salts by vaporization, whereas the dryout method causes seawater within the membrane to evaporate, leaving crystalline solutes trapped within the membrane. Such trapped particles may act as a path for rewetting, and also impair permeate flux and system energy efficiency. For all three methods, membranes tested with higher salinity water had lower LEP restoration irrespective of the restoration technique used. A method for testing LEP with more accuracy was also developed, using stepwise pressure increases. SEM images showed that the restoration methods did not alter the membranes themselves, although there remains a possibility that the air backwashing can cause superficial tears.
AB - The critical failure mode for membrane distillation (MD) desalination is wetting through the pores of the hydrophobic membrane, which allows the saline solution to leak through and contaminate the permeate. The standard practice for reversing membrane wetting is to dry out the membrane for several hours before resuming the desalination process. An alternative method for mitigating MD membrane wetting is examined in this study, wherein pressurized air is pushed through the membrane from the permeate side for several seconds, forcing trapped water out before it can evaporate. To compare the wetting reversal methods, the liquid entry pressure (LEP) was surpassed with saline water at varied salinity. Then, either a 24+ hour dryout, a 10 second pressurized air treatment, or both were applied, followed by remeasuring the LEP. Pressurized air backwashing restored the LEP to 75% of the original value for lower salinity feeds. The backwashing method is hypothesized to achieve this superior result because it removes saline solution from the membrane without separating water and salts by vaporization, whereas the dryout method causes seawater within the membrane to evaporate, leaving crystalline solutes trapped within the membrane. Such trapped particles may act as a path for rewetting, and also impair permeate flux and system energy efficiency. For all three methods, membranes tested with higher salinity water had lower LEP restoration irrespective of the restoration technique used. A method for testing LEP with more accuracy was also developed, using stepwise pressure increases. SEM images showed that the restoration methods did not alter the membranes themselves, although there remains a possibility that the air backwashing can cause superficial tears.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028438733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c7ew00085e
DO - 10.1039/c7ew00085e
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028438733
SN - 2053-1400
VL - 3
SP - 930
EP - 939
JO - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
JF - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
IS - 5
ER -