TY - JOUR
T1 - Recent advances on the application of low salinity waterflooding and chemical enhanced oil recovery
AU - Gbadamosi, Afeez
AU - Patil, Shirish
AU - Al Shehri, Dhafer
AU - Kamal, Muhammad Shahzad
AU - Hussain, S. M.Shakil
AU - Al-Shalabi, Emad W.
AU - Hassan, Anas Mohammed
N1 - Funding Information:
This publication is based upon work supported by the KFUPM-KU Joint Research Program, Saudi Arabia . Author(s) at KFUPM, Saudi Arabia would like to acknowledge the support received under grant # KU-201-001 . Author(s) at Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates acknowledges the support received under award # KFUPM-KU-2020-14 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is used to retrieve capillary trapped and bypassed oil in the reservoir. Accordingly, laboratory and field applications of chemical EOR (CEOR) methods have been evaluated with varying degrees of efficiency. Nonetheless, the chemicals tend to precipitate in harsh reservoir conditions, thereby inhibiting the efficiency of the EOR process. Low salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is another EOR technique that has been gaining prodigious attention for recovering additional oil from the reservoir due to its sterling properties. However, LSWF has a low oil recovery efficiency especially in heavy oil reservoirs. Recently, the synergic combination of LSWF with chemical EOR has been exploited, explored, and evaluated. Herein, the type, mechanism, and efficiency of the newly devised hybrid EOR method have been reviewed. Moreover, its application is evaluated for sandstones and carbonates. Experimental and modeling results revealed that the combination of LSWF and chemical EOR yields a higher efficiency compared to the individual EOR method. The interplay of underlying mechanisms during the hybrid process resulting in higher oil recovery efficiency was elucidated. Finally, gaps in research and recommendation for future studies were highlighted.
AB - Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is used to retrieve capillary trapped and bypassed oil in the reservoir. Accordingly, laboratory and field applications of chemical EOR (CEOR) methods have been evaluated with varying degrees of efficiency. Nonetheless, the chemicals tend to precipitate in harsh reservoir conditions, thereby inhibiting the efficiency of the EOR process. Low salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is another EOR technique that has been gaining prodigious attention for recovering additional oil from the reservoir due to its sterling properties. However, LSWF has a low oil recovery efficiency especially in heavy oil reservoirs. Recently, the synergic combination of LSWF with chemical EOR has been exploited, explored, and evaluated. Herein, the type, mechanism, and efficiency of the newly devised hybrid EOR method have been reviewed. Moreover, its application is evaluated for sandstones and carbonates. Experimental and modeling results revealed that the combination of LSWF and chemical EOR yields a higher efficiency compared to the individual EOR method. The interplay of underlying mechanisms during the hybrid process resulting in higher oil recovery efficiency was elucidated. Finally, gaps in research and recommendation for future studies were highlighted.
KW - Enhanced oil recovery
KW - Foam flooding
KW - Low salinity waterflooding
KW - Polymer flooding
KW - Surfactant flooding
KW - Surfactant–alternating-gas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135900351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.001
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85135900351
SN - 2352-4847
VL - 8
SP - 9969
EP - 9996
JO - Energy Reports
JF - Energy Reports
ER -