TY - CONF
T1 - Quantitative analysis of absolute permeability and porosity in carbonate rocks using digital rock physics
AU - Rahimov, Khurshed
AU - AlSumaiti, Ali M.
AU - Jouini, Mohamed Soufiane
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge The Petroleum Institute (PI) for providing research facilities and the Oil-Subcommittee of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) for funding this research work. We also would like to thank Ingrain, Inc. for allowing to use their state-of-art micro-CT and other facilities to perform multiscale imaging.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 JFES. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Reservoir rock properties, particularly porosity and absolute permeability, are cornerstone to any reservoir characterization project. Digital Rock Physics (DRP) is a newly emerged technique which has gained scientist's attraction to estimate petrophysical properties in sandstones reservoirs. Nevertheless, in carbonate reservoirs imaging pore structure remains challenging due to its heterogeneity at several length scales when compared to sandstone cores. This study aims to accurately characterize a carbonate core-plug from the Middle East using DRP. To achieve this, we apply multiscale imaging approach using a state-of-the-art micro-CT. After laboratory measurements, we scan whole sample with 39 µm resolution and extract a sub-plug for higher resolution scanning. We scan it at resolution of 5.25 µm, in which pore connectivity is not fully captured. Thus, we drilled a micro-plug from sub-plug and scan it at resolution of 0.39 µm. At this scale, pore connectivity is revealed from top to bottom in the 3D image. We estimate porosity of segmented micro-plug images and integrate to core-plug scale by including visible pores of sub-plug and core-plug. We use Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) to simulate fluid flow. We implement two approaches to examine the variability of derived permeability. First, we compute the permeability of the whole 3D micro-plug image. Second, we systematically divide the whole 3D image into small blocks and estimate the effective permeability of blocks by simulating Darcy flow through them. The porosity from images is comparable with laboratory measurements. The difference between them is 1 pu. The permeability value from first approach are in good agreement with experimental result. However, the second approach overestimates laboratory measurement by 40 percent. Yet, the results from both approaches are comparable to laboratory permeability.
AB - Reservoir rock properties, particularly porosity and absolute permeability, are cornerstone to any reservoir characterization project. Digital Rock Physics (DRP) is a newly emerged technique which has gained scientist's attraction to estimate petrophysical properties in sandstones reservoirs. Nevertheless, in carbonate reservoirs imaging pore structure remains challenging due to its heterogeneity at several length scales when compared to sandstone cores. This study aims to accurately characterize a carbonate core-plug from the Middle East using DRP. To achieve this, we apply multiscale imaging approach using a state-of-the-art micro-CT. After laboratory measurements, we scan whole sample with 39 µm resolution and extract a sub-plug for higher resolution scanning. We scan it at resolution of 5.25 µm, in which pore connectivity is not fully captured. Thus, we drilled a micro-plug from sub-plug and scan it at resolution of 0.39 µm. At this scale, pore connectivity is revealed from top to bottom in the 3D image. We estimate porosity of segmented micro-plug images and integrate to core-plug scale by including visible pores of sub-plug and core-plug. We use Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) to simulate fluid flow. We implement two approaches to examine the variability of derived permeability. First, we compute the permeability of the whole 3D micro-plug image. Second, we systematically divide the whole 3D image into small blocks and estimate the effective permeability of blocks by simulating Darcy flow through them. The porosity from images is comparable with laboratory measurements. The difference between them is 1 pu. The permeability value from first approach are in good agreement with experimental result. However, the second approach overestimates laboratory measurement by 40 percent. Yet, the results from both approaches are comparable to laboratory permeability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050349368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:85050349368
T2 - 22nd Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan 2016
Y2 - 29 September 2016 through 30 September 2016
ER -