Prenatal and neonatal Group B Streptococcus screening and serotyping in Lebanon: Incidence and implications

  • Muheiddine Seoud
  • , Anwar H. Nassar
  • , Pierre Zalloua
  • , Nansi Boghossian
  • , Jihad Ezeddine
  • , Hassan Fakhoury
  • , Joseph Abboud
  • , Imad Melki
  • , George Araj
  • , Ghinwa Nacouzi
  • , May Sanyoura
  • , Khalid Yunis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study aimed at determining the prevalence, risk factors, perinatal transmission, and serotypes of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) among pregnant women and their newborns in Beirut, Lebanon. This was a cross-sectional study of all pregnant women admitted from February to September 2006 to three major hospitals. Overall, 137 of 775 (17.7%) mothers and 50 of 682 newborns (7.3%) tested positive for GBS. Maternal colonization was not associated with maternal age, household income, gravidity, intrapartum fever, preterm labor, or premature rupture of membrane. Transmission rate was 40/120 (30%). Serotype 5 (24.1%) was the most common followed by serotype 1a (15.0%), 3 (14.4%), 2 (11.8%) and 1b (7.5%). Pregnant women in Lebanon appear to have a relatively high prevalence of GBS colonization with no identifiable risk factors for its acquisition. These results could provide basis for the institution of a national policy for universal maternal GBS screening to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)399-403
Number of pages5
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Perinatal transmission
  • Pregnant women
  • Risk factors
  • Serotypes of Group B Streptococcus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prenatal and neonatal Group B Streptococcus screening and serotyping in Lebanon: Incidence and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this