TY - JOUR
T1 - Photocatalytic water splitting for solving energy crisis
T2 - Myth, Fact or Busted?
AU - Ng, Kim Hoong
AU - Lai, Sin Yuan
AU - Cheng, Chin Kui
AU - Cheng, Yoke Wang
AU - Chong, Chi Cheng
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors acknowledge financial and facility supports from Xiamen University Malaysia (XMUM). This work is funded and supported by Xiamen University Malaysia Research Fund (Grant no. XMUMRF/2019-C4/IENG/0019 & XMUMRF/2020-C5/IENG/0029 ). Yoke Wang Cheng and Chi Cheng Chong would also like to acknowledge support from Ministry of Education Malaysia through Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) award (Cost centre: 015MA0-052) to Centre for Biofuel and Biochemical Research (CBBR).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Reaping hydrogen energy by utilising eternal sunlight offers a good fit to the theme of popularly-hype sustainable and carbon-free energy future. Contrary to that belief, this review unveils the impracticality of photocatalytic water splitting (solar energy for H2 energy) to fuel global advancement. Despite some success with idealized laboratory-scale studies, the past research works also mutually evinced an extreme low solar-to-hydrogen efficiency (STH < 1.0%). Hitherto, multifarious endeavours, such as advanced reactor design, facilities to eliminate diffusional restrictions, advanced photocatalyst design and an inclusion of sacrificial reagents, are incapable to raise STH efficiency to the practical threshold of STH > 10%. Regardless of the epitome and modifications of photocatalysts, the intrinsic limitation of charges recombination remains a sturdy obstacle, leading to an appreciable energy losses and low STH. For consequential solar-driven H2 production, the bandgap energy of photocatalyst employed must stay below 2.36 eV. Meanwhile, most photocatalysts are capped by the theoretical maximum STH of 18%, even with the assumption of 100% quantum yield of corresponding spectrum. Nonetheless, the theoretical maximum STH is unattainable at this juncture due to the inevitable solar energy dissipation associated to the scattering effects of reactor and water. From economy standpoint, H2 production via photocatalytic water splitting is pricey at 10.36 $/kg with exorbitant upfront costs, which is far beyond the practicable price range of 2 – 4 $/kg. In conclusion, we assert that the H2 production from solar-driven photocatalytic water splitting is an industrially impractical pathway for solar energy harnessing, despite technically-feasible.
AB - Reaping hydrogen energy by utilising eternal sunlight offers a good fit to the theme of popularly-hype sustainable and carbon-free energy future. Contrary to that belief, this review unveils the impracticality of photocatalytic water splitting (solar energy for H2 energy) to fuel global advancement. Despite some success with idealized laboratory-scale studies, the past research works also mutually evinced an extreme low solar-to-hydrogen efficiency (STH < 1.0%). Hitherto, multifarious endeavours, such as advanced reactor design, facilities to eliminate diffusional restrictions, advanced photocatalyst design and an inclusion of sacrificial reagents, are incapable to raise STH efficiency to the practical threshold of STH > 10%. Regardless of the epitome and modifications of photocatalysts, the intrinsic limitation of charges recombination remains a sturdy obstacle, leading to an appreciable energy losses and low STH. For consequential solar-driven H2 production, the bandgap energy of photocatalyst employed must stay below 2.36 eV. Meanwhile, most photocatalysts are capped by the theoretical maximum STH of 18%, even with the assumption of 100% quantum yield of corresponding spectrum. Nonetheless, the theoretical maximum STH is unattainable at this juncture due to the inevitable solar energy dissipation associated to the scattering effects of reactor and water. From economy standpoint, H2 production via photocatalytic water splitting is pricey at 10.36 $/kg with exorbitant upfront costs, which is far beyond the practicable price range of 2 – 4 $/kg. In conclusion, we assert that the H2 production from solar-driven photocatalytic water splitting is an industrially impractical pathway for solar energy harnessing, despite technically-feasible.
KW - Back reaction
KW - Charges recombination
KW - Infeasible for energy generation
KW - Intrinsic limitations
KW - Photocatalytic water splitting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102536518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128847
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128847
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85102536518
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 417
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 128847
ER -