TY - JOUR
T1 - On convexity analysis for discrete delta Riemann–Liouville fractional differences analytically and numerically
AU - Baleanu, Dumitru
AU - Mohammed, Pshtiwan Othman
AU - Srivastava, Hari Mohan
AU - Al-Sarairah, Eman
AU - Abdeljawad, Thabet
AU - Hamed, Y. S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Taif University Researchers Supporting Project (No. TURSP-2020/155), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia, and the fifth author would like to thank Prince Sultan University for the support through the TAS research lab.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In this paper, we focus on the analytical and numerical convexity analysis of discrete delta Riemann–Liouville fractional differences. In the analytical part of this paper, we give a new formula for the discrete delta Riemann-Liouville fractional difference as an alternative definition. We establish a formula for the Δ 2, which will be useful to obtain the convexity results. We examine the correlation between the positivity of (w0RLΔαf)(t) and convexity of the function. In view of the basic lemmas, we define two decreasing subsets of (2 , 3 ) , Hk,ϵ and Mk,ϵ. The decrease of these sets allows us to obtain the relationship between the negative lower bound of (w0RLΔαf)(t) and convexity of the function on a finite time set Nw0P:={w0,w0+1,w0+2,…,P} for some P∈Nw0:={w0,w0+1,w0+2,…}. The numerical part of the paper is dedicated to examinin the validity of the sets Hk,ϵ and Mk,ϵ for different values of k and ϵ. For this reason, we illustrate the domain of solutions via several figures explaining the validity of the main theorem.
AB - In this paper, we focus on the analytical and numerical convexity analysis of discrete delta Riemann–Liouville fractional differences. In the analytical part of this paper, we give a new formula for the discrete delta Riemann-Liouville fractional difference as an alternative definition. We establish a formula for the Δ 2, which will be useful to obtain the convexity results. We examine the correlation between the positivity of (w0RLΔαf)(t) and convexity of the function. In view of the basic lemmas, we define two decreasing subsets of (2 , 3 ) , Hk,ϵ and Mk,ϵ. The decrease of these sets allows us to obtain the relationship between the negative lower bound of (w0RLΔαf)(t) and convexity of the function on a finite time set Nw0P:={w0,w0+1,w0+2,…,P} for some P∈Nw0:={w0,w0+1,w0+2,…}. The numerical part of the paper is dedicated to examinin the validity of the sets Hk,ϵ and Mk,ϵ for different values of k and ϵ. For this reason, we illustrate the domain of solutions via several figures explaining the validity of the main theorem.
KW - Analytical and numerical results
KW - Convexity analysis
KW - Discrete delta Riemann–Liouville fractional difference
KW - Negative lower bound
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146234669
U2 - 10.1186/s13660-023-02916-2
DO - 10.1186/s13660-023-02916-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146234669
SN - 1025-5834
VL - 2023
JO - Journal of Inequalities and Applications
JF - Journal of Inequalities and Applications
IS - 1
M1 - 4
ER -