TY - JOUR
T1 - Obtaining Performance of Type-3 Phase-Locked Loop Without Compromising the Benefits of Type-2 Control System
AU - Kanjiya, Parag
AU - Khadkikar, Vinod
AU - El Moursi, Mohamed Shawky
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - A phase-locked loop (PLL) is a closed-loop feedback control system that estimates the frequency as well as phase of an input signal. The most commonly deployed synchronization method in three-phase applications is a type-2 synchronous reference frame PLL. With pre/in-loop selective harmonic filtering stage, type-2 PLLs can obtain good detection speed, decent stability margins, and better disturbance rejection. However, it suffers from the finite steady-state phase error during ramp change in input signal frequency. To tackle this challenge type-3 PLLs have been developed recently, either by adding a feed-forward path to the PLL structure, or by using a second-order controller as the loop filter. However, recent analysis carried out of type-3 PLLs show that they aggravate stability problem and compromise the performance in terms of detection speed and disturbance rejection. A new concept of synchronization is proposed in this paper that obtains the performance of type-3 PLL but retains all the advantages associated with type-2 PLL. Extensive experimental results are provided to validate the proposed work.
AB - A phase-locked loop (PLL) is a closed-loop feedback control system that estimates the frequency as well as phase of an input signal. The most commonly deployed synchronization method in three-phase applications is a type-2 synchronous reference frame PLL. With pre/in-loop selective harmonic filtering stage, type-2 PLLs can obtain good detection speed, decent stability margins, and better disturbance rejection. However, it suffers from the finite steady-state phase error during ramp change in input signal frequency. To tackle this challenge type-3 PLLs have been developed recently, either by adding a feed-forward path to the PLL structure, or by using a second-order controller as the loop filter. However, recent analysis carried out of type-3 PLLs show that they aggravate stability problem and compromise the performance in terms of detection speed and disturbance rejection. A new concept of synchronization is proposed in this paper that obtains the performance of type-3 PLL but retains all the advantages associated with type-2 PLL. Extensive experimental results are provided to validate the proposed work.
KW - Disturbance rejection
KW - feedback control system
KW - frequency-locked loop (FLL)
KW - stability
KW - synchronous reference frame phase-locked loop (SRF-PLL)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034105557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2686440
DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2686440
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85034105557
SN - 0885-8993
VL - 33
SP - 1788
EP - 1796
JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
IS - 2
M1 - 7885123
ER -