TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical modeling of combined low salinity water and carbon dioxide in carbonate cores
AU - Al-Shalabi, Emad W.
AU - Sepehrnoori, Kamy
AU - Pope, Gary
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge useful discussions with Larry W. Lake during this research. This work was funded by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - This paper investigates the combined effect of injecting low salinity water (LSWI) and carbon dioxide (CO2) on oil recovery from carbonate cores. The combined effect of LSWI and CO2 injection on oil recovery was predicted by performing several 1D simulations using measured reservoir rock and fluid data. These simulations included the effect of salinity on both miscible and immiscible continuous gas injection (CGI), simultaneous water-alternating-gas (SWAG), constant water-alternating-gas (WAG), and tapered (WAG). For SWAG and constant and tapered WAG, both seawater and its dilutions were simulated. CO2 was injected above its minimum miscibility pressure. Baker's three-phase relative permeability model was modified to account for the effect of salinity on the water/oil relative permeability.The results show that SWAG, whether using seawater or its dilutions, outperformed all other tertiary injection modes in terms of oil recovery. Moreover, the SWAG process has both the highest tertiary recovery factor (TRF) and the lowest utilization factor (UF). This study highlights the advantage of using low salinity water along with miscible CO2. The miscible CO2 displaces the residual oil saturation whereas the low salinity water boosts the production rate by increasing the oil relative permeability through wettability alteration towards more a water-wet state. The latter finding was supported by comparing our simulations with the two corefloods reported by Chandrasekhar and Mohanty (2014). These corefloods were conducted in SWAG tertiary mode using seawater and its dilutions. Fractional flow analysis shows that SWAG with low salinity water requires less injected solvent compared to SWAG with seawater and miscible CGI.
AB - This paper investigates the combined effect of injecting low salinity water (LSWI) and carbon dioxide (CO2) on oil recovery from carbonate cores. The combined effect of LSWI and CO2 injection on oil recovery was predicted by performing several 1D simulations using measured reservoir rock and fluid data. These simulations included the effect of salinity on both miscible and immiscible continuous gas injection (CGI), simultaneous water-alternating-gas (SWAG), constant water-alternating-gas (WAG), and tapered (WAG). For SWAG and constant and tapered WAG, both seawater and its dilutions were simulated. CO2 was injected above its minimum miscibility pressure. Baker's three-phase relative permeability model was modified to account for the effect of salinity on the water/oil relative permeability.The results show that SWAG, whether using seawater or its dilutions, outperformed all other tertiary injection modes in terms of oil recovery. Moreover, the SWAG process has both the highest tertiary recovery factor (TRF) and the lowest utilization factor (UF). This study highlights the advantage of using low salinity water along with miscible CO2. The miscible CO2 displaces the residual oil saturation whereas the low salinity water boosts the production rate by increasing the oil relative permeability through wettability alteration towards more a water-wet state. The latter finding was supported by comparing our simulations with the two corefloods reported by Chandrasekhar and Mohanty (2014). These corefloods were conducted in SWAG tertiary mode using seawater and its dilutions. Fractional flow analysis shows that SWAG with low salinity water requires less injected solvent compared to SWAG with seawater and miscible CGI.
KW - Combined effect of LSWI and CO
KW - Fractional flow analysis
KW - Low salinity water injection (LSWI)
KW - Tertiary recovery factor
KW - Utilization factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949200031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.021
DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84949200031
SN - 0920-4105
VL - 137
SP - 157
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
ER -