TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical investigation of air gap membrane distillation (AGMD)
T2 - Seeking optimal performance
AU - Janajreh, Isam
AU - El Kadi, Khadije
AU - Hashaikeh, Raed
AU - Ahmed, Rizwan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Takreer Research Center (TRC) and Masdar Institute of Abu Dhabi UAE under grant number X2016-000022 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/12/15
Y1 - 2017/12/15
N2 - Membrane distillation (MD) is used in desalination, wastewater treatment, and medicinal application. Direct contact (DCMD) and air-gap (AGMD) membrane distillation are the most common configurations. The simplicity and high flux marks the advantages of the former while the low fouling is attributed to the latter. The air-gap integration used between the bottom surface of membrane and the permeate although adds thermal resistance it reduces membrane wetting and fouling. Researchers continue to investigate these configurations to optimize their performance. In this work, high fidelity numerical analysis is carried out to assess and quantify the performance of the AGMD and compare it with the DCMD. Different geometric and operating parameters are considered. Results are demonstrated in terms of temperature distributions, polarization-coefficient (TPC), mass-flux, heat-flux, surface heat coefficients, and thermal efficiency (η). Results reveal that the integration of a thin air-gap reduces the TPC by 38%, the total heat-flux by 37%, and nearly 22% for each of the mass-flux and the thermal efficiency. Furthermore, increasing AGMD feed temperature from 50 °C to 75 °C cause increase in the mass flux from 3.34 to 15.3 g/m2·s that corresponds to increase in the thermal efficiency from 11.5% to 52.7%. Higher temperature show much larger effect on the performance than flow velocity.
AB - Membrane distillation (MD) is used in desalination, wastewater treatment, and medicinal application. Direct contact (DCMD) and air-gap (AGMD) membrane distillation are the most common configurations. The simplicity and high flux marks the advantages of the former while the low fouling is attributed to the latter. The air-gap integration used between the bottom surface of membrane and the permeate although adds thermal resistance it reduces membrane wetting and fouling. Researchers continue to investigate these configurations to optimize their performance. In this work, high fidelity numerical analysis is carried out to assess and quantify the performance of the AGMD and compare it with the DCMD. Different geometric and operating parameters are considered. Results are demonstrated in terms of temperature distributions, polarization-coefficient (TPC), mass-flux, heat-flux, surface heat coefficients, and thermal efficiency (η). Results reveal that the integration of a thin air-gap reduces the TPC by 38%, the total heat-flux by 37%, and nearly 22% for each of the mass-flux and the thermal efficiency. Furthermore, increasing AGMD feed temperature from 50 °C to 75 °C cause increase in the mass flux from 3.34 to 15.3 g/m2·s that corresponds to increase in the thermal efficiency from 11.5% to 52.7%. Higher temperature show much larger effect on the performance than flow velocity.
KW - Air gap membrane distillation
KW - CFD
KW - DCMD
KW - Heat transfer
KW - Temperature polarization coefficient
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032464554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032464554
SN - 0011-9164
VL - 424
SP - 122
EP - 130
JO - Desalination
JF - Desalination
ER -