TY - JOUR
T1 - Musculoskeletal model predictions sensitivity to upper body mass scaling during gait
AU - Hulleck, Abdul Aziz Vaqar Ahmed
AU - Abdullah, Muhammad
AU - Alkhalaileh, Abdel Salam Tareq
AU - Liu, Tao
AU - Mohan, Dhanya Menoth
AU - Katmah, Rateb
AU - Khalaf, Kinda
AU - El-Rich, Marwan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Musculoskeletal modeling based on inverse dynamics provides a cost-effective non-invasive means for calculating intersegmental joint reaction forces and moments, solely relying on kinematic data, easily obtained from smart wearables. On the other hand, the accuracy and precision of such models strongly hinge upon the selected scaling methodology tailored to subject-specific data. This study investigates the impact of upper body mass distribution on internal and external kinetics computed using a comprehensive musculoskeletal model during level walking in both normal weight and obese individuals. Human motion data was collected using seventeen body worn inertial measuring units for nineteen (19) healthy subjects. The results indicate that variations in segmental masses and centers of mass, resulting from diverse mass scaling techniques, significantly affect ground reaction force estimations in obese subjects, particularly in the vertical component, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 54.7 ± 23.8 %BW; followed by 12.3 ± 8.0 %BW (medio-lateral); and 6.2 ± 3.2 %BW (antero-posterior). The vertical component of hip, knee, and ankle joint reaction forces also exhibit sensitivity to personalized mass distribution variations. Importantly, the degree of deviation in model predictions increases with body mass index. Statistical analysis using single sample Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test for non-normal data and t-test for normal data, revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the computed errors in kinetic parameters between the two scaling approaches. The body shape-based scaling approach significantly impacts musculoskeletal modeling in clinical applications where the upper body mass distribution is crucial, such as in spinal deformities, obesity, and low back pain. This approach accounts for the body shape inherent variability within the same BMI category and enhances the predicted joint kinetics.
AB - Musculoskeletal modeling based on inverse dynamics provides a cost-effective non-invasive means for calculating intersegmental joint reaction forces and moments, solely relying on kinematic data, easily obtained from smart wearables. On the other hand, the accuracy and precision of such models strongly hinge upon the selected scaling methodology tailored to subject-specific data. This study investigates the impact of upper body mass distribution on internal and external kinetics computed using a comprehensive musculoskeletal model during level walking in both normal weight and obese individuals. Human motion data was collected using seventeen body worn inertial measuring units for nineteen (19) healthy subjects. The results indicate that variations in segmental masses and centers of mass, resulting from diverse mass scaling techniques, significantly affect ground reaction force estimations in obese subjects, particularly in the vertical component, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 54.7 ± 23.8 %BW; followed by 12.3 ± 8.0 %BW (medio-lateral); and 6.2 ± 3.2 %BW (antero-posterior). The vertical component of hip, knee, and ankle joint reaction forces also exhibit sensitivity to personalized mass distribution variations. Importantly, the degree of deviation in model predictions increases with body mass index. Statistical analysis using single sample Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test for non-normal data and t-test for normal data, revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the computed errors in kinetic parameters between the two scaling approaches. The body shape-based scaling approach significantly impacts musculoskeletal modeling in clinical applications where the upper body mass distribution is crucial, such as in spinal deformities, obesity, and low back pain. This approach accounts for the body shape inherent variability within the same BMI category and enhances the predicted joint kinetics.
KW - Gait biomechanics
KW - Musculoskeletal modeling
KW - Subject-specific upper body mass distribution
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215947231
U2 - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109739
DO - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109739
M3 - Article
C2 - 39874814
AN - SCOPUS:85215947231
SN - 0010-4825
VL - 186
JO - Computers in Biology and Medicine
JF - Computers in Biology and Medicine
M1 - 109739
ER -