TY - JOUR
T1 - Leveraging Design Thinking to Enhance Engineering Teaching
T2 - An Operational Model
AU - Au, Emily Yim Lee
AU - Goonetilleke, Ravindra S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1963-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Contribution: The proposed operational model offers a detailed framework for understanding the complexities of design thinking. It helps instructors evaluate each stage, promoting the development of high-quality designs. This model emphasizes the link between the various stages and the final design quality, steering students toward achieving outstanding results. Background: Design thinking benefits students across almost all majors by promoting critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. It places a strong emphasis on the user's needs and involves testing and refining prototypes with empathy for the user. While easy to grasp, its practical application poses complex challenges, particularly in engineering and science education. Intended Outcomes: This study examines the challenges of teaching design thinking and proposes an operational model to represent the design process. Application Design: The model incorporates a "spring system"to demonstrate potential variations in the design process, including the number of user-centered design (UCD) methods used, the size of the problem/solution space, the difficulty or resistance to transitioning between activities, and time spent on each activity. Findings: Two projects illustrate the use of the model. Using the proposed metrics, the design process can be established, and the operational model can control the learning process while enhancing the consistency and quality of the design outcome. Future empirical research should validate the model's effectiveness, address biases, and foster critical thinking and diverse perspectives within student teams.
AB - Contribution: The proposed operational model offers a detailed framework for understanding the complexities of design thinking. It helps instructors evaluate each stage, promoting the development of high-quality designs. This model emphasizes the link between the various stages and the final design quality, steering students toward achieving outstanding results. Background: Design thinking benefits students across almost all majors by promoting critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. It places a strong emphasis on the user's needs and involves testing and refining prototypes with empathy for the user. While easy to grasp, its practical application poses complex challenges, particularly in engineering and science education. Intended Outcomes: This study examines the challenges of teaching design thinking and proposes an operational model to represent the design process. Application Design: The model incorporates a "spring system"to demonstrate potential variations in the design process, including the number of user-centered design (UCD) methods used, the size of the problem/solution space, the difficulty or resistance to transitioning between activities, and time spent on each activity. Findings: Two projects illustrate the use of the model. Using the proposed metrics, the design process can be established, and the operational model can control the learning process while enhancing the consistency and quality of the design outcome. Future empirical research should validate the model's effectiveness, address biases, and foster critical thinking and diverse perspectives within student teams.
KW - Creative thinking
KW - design for humanity
KW - design teaching
KW - empathetic design
KW - human-centered design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207146495
U2 - 10.1109/TE.2024.3467387
DO - 10.1109/TE.2024.3467387
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207146495
SN - 0018-9359
VL - 68
SP - 95
EP - 102
JO - IEEE Transactions on Education
JF - IEEE Transactions on Education
IS - 1
ER -