Abstract
Inspection of thick and low-density multilayer composite structures is of paramount importance. X-ray computed tomography (CT) and phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) are widely employed modalities for non-destructive testing (NDT) of these composites. Owing to low density of constituent materials typically utilised to construct composites and rich wave scattering within their structures, inspecting them using X-ray CT and PAUT does not always yield acceptable flaw detection results. On the other hand, microwave NDT techniques have shown to be particularly suitable for inspecting thick multilayer non-carbon-based composites. However, the relative performance of emerging microwave NDT techniques and the widely accepted X-ray CT and PAUT is yet to be established. This paper provides first-of-its-kind experimental comparison between microwave, X-ray CT, and PAUT on a comprehensive set of thick composite samples with different defect types. It is demonstrated herein that microwave NDT performed on par with X-ray CT in terms of defect detection capability (qualitatively and quantitatively), and in many cases outperformed PAUT. A detailed summary overviewing the performance, advantages and shortcomings of each method for particualr defect types is included which disseminates new knowledge to benefit practitioners and researchers alike.
| Original language | British English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2023 |
Keywords
- Composites
- microwave imaging
- non-destructive testing
- phased array ultrasonic testing
- synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
- X-ray computed tomography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inspection of thick composites: a comparative study between microwaves, X-ray computed tomography and ultrasonic testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver