TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Heterogeneity on Carbonate Permeability Upscaling
T2 - A Renormalization Approach Coupled with the Pore Network Model
AU - Zhang, Haiyang
AU - Ait Abderrahmane, Hamid
AU - Arif, Muhammad
AU - Al Kobaisi, Mohammed
AU - Sassi, Mohamed
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the funding provided by the TOTAL and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC). Moreover, H.Z. acknowledges the Khalifa University for providing scholarship for his graduate studies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3/17
Y1 - 2022/3/17
N2 - Permeability upscaling in carbonate rocks is challenging due to the heterogeneity at multiple scales. Although there are several computational methods for permeability upscaling, the applicability, computational time, and the associated accuracy of these methods may vary significantly. This article modified an established Karim and Krabbenhoft renormalization method (KRM) and proposed a regression-based renormalization for permeability upscaling in carbonate rocks, and the results are compared with the classical KRM. To this end, permeability at the small-scale samples (size = 5003and 6003voxels, from 405 to 7944 μm3) and the whole core plug scale are computed from three carbonate samples of varying heterogeneity and composition using pore network models extracted from 3D micro-CT images. Subsequently, the modified regression-based renormalization method is applied to calculate the regression (upscaled) permeability. Our results indicate that the regression permeability is in good agreement with experimental permeability for full-size core plug estimations (maximum error = 11.07%) using the proposed RKRM approach-suggesting the accuracy of this method. Furthermore, the relative error of the permeability estimation from small-scale samples using KRM was much higher than those of the RKRM-suggesting the superiority of the proposed approach over the classical one. The observed errors in permeability using the RKRM approach, despite being lower than the classical KRM approach, are attributed to the heterogeneity of carbonate samples at the sub-core and core scales. The results of this study thus add to the general understanding of permeability upscaling in carbonates and the associated impact of heterogeneity.
AB - Permeability upscaling in carbonate rocks is challenging due to the heterogeneity at multiple scales. Although there are several computational methods for permeability upscaling, the applicability, computational time, and the associated accuracy of these methods may vary significantly. This article modified an established Karim and Krabbenhoft renormalization method (KRM) and proposed a regression-based renormalization for permeability upscaling in carbonate rocks, and the results are compared with the classical KRM. To this end, permeability at the small-scale samples (size = 5003and 6003voxels, from 405 to 7944 μm3) and the whole core plug scale are computed from three carbonate samples of varying heterogeneity and composition using pore network models extracted from 3D micro-CT images. Subsequently, the modified regression-based renormalization method is applied to calculate the regression (upscaled) permeability. Our results indicate that the regression permeability is in good agreement with experimental permeability for full-size core plug estimations (maximum error = 11.07%) using the proposed RKRM approach-suggesting the accuracy of this method. Furthermore, the relative error of the permeability estimation from small-scale samples using KRM was much higher than those of the RKRM-suggesting the superiority of the proposed approach over the classical one. The observed errors in permeability using the RKRM approach, despite being lower than the classical KRM approach, are attributed to the heterogeneity of carbonate samples at the sub-core and core scales. The results of this study thus add to the general understanding of permeability upscaling in carbonates and the associated impact of heterogeneity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125793138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04010
DO - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125793138
SN - 0887-0624
VL - 36
SP - 3003
EP - 3015
JO - Energy and Fuels
JF - Energy and Fuels
IS - 6
ER -