Improving local path planning for UAV flight in challenging environments by refining cost function weights

Andreas Thoma, Alessandro Gardi, Alex Fisher, Carsten Braun

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) constantly gain in versatility. However, more reliable path planning algorithms are required until full autonomous UAV operation is possible. This work investigates the algorithm 3DVFH* and analyses its dependency on its cost function weights in 2400 environments. The analysis shows that the 3DVFH* can find a suitable path in every environment. However, a particular type of environment requires a specific choice of cost function weights. For minimal failure, probability interdependencies between the weights of the cost function have to be considered. This dependency reduces the number of control parameters and simplifies the usage of the 3DVFH*. Weights for costs associated with vertical evasion (pitch cost) and vicinity to obstacles (obstacle cost) have the highest influence on the failure probability of the local path planner. Environments with mainly very tall buildings (like large American city centres) require a preference for horizontal avoidance manoeuvres (achieved with high pitch cost weights). In contrast, environments with medium-to-low buildings (like European city centres) benefit from vertical avoidance manoeuvres (achieved with low pitch cost weights). The cost of the vicinity to obstacles also plays an essential role and must be chosen adequately for the environment. Choosing these two weights ideal is sufficient to reduce the failure probability below 10%.

    Original languageBritish English
    JournalCEAS Aeronautical Journal
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - 2024

    Keywords

    • Bio-inspired systems
    • Obstacle avoidance
    • Path planning
    • Unmanned aerial vehicles

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Improving local path planning for UAV flight in challenging environments by refining cost function weights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this