TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Yeast Strain Selection on Ethanol Yield from Low Concentration KMnO4 Pretreated Rice Straw
T2 - Process Design and Utility Cost Analysis
AU - Amornraksa, Suksun
AU - Sriariyanun, Malinee
AU - Tawai, Atthasit
AU - Tantayotai, Prapakorn
AU - Thanok, Sunphong
AU - Phusantsumpan, Theerawut
AU - Show, Pau Loke
AU - Katam, Keerthi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - This study evaluates the impact of yeast strain selection on ethanol yield from KMnO4-pretreated rice straw, integrating process design and utility cost analysis. KMnO4—a cost-effective, widely available, and less toxic alternative to acid pretreatments—is applied at a 1.36% concentration. Fermentation of a 49 mg/mL sugar solution using four yeast strains identified Pichia kudriavzevii TISTR 5147 (PK 5147) as the most efficient, achieving a 93.59% ethanol conversion—significantly outperforming Saccharomyces cerevisiae (20.95%), Kluyveromyces marxianus TISTR 5116 (5.96%), and K. marxianus TISTR 5616 (7.51%). Aspen Plus® simulations reveal that although PK 5147 requires 20–24% more distillation energy, its utility cost per ton of ethanol is substantially lower—22 times lower than TISTR 5116 and 13 times less than S. cerevisiae. Higher ethanol concentrations reduced purification energy, and solvent recycling further optimized process costs. Additional savings are achieved through the integration of high-temperature solvent and water recycling within the process design. The wide range of ethanol yields observed (5.96–93.59%) highlights the critical role of software-based cost estimation in evaluating experimental results during early-stage process design.
AB - This study evaluates the impact of yeast strain selection on ethanol yield from KMnO4-pretreated rice straw, integrating process design and utility cost analysis. KMnO4—a cost-effective, widely available, and less toxic alternative to acid pretreatments—is applied at a 1.36% concentration. Fermentation of a 49 mg/mL sugar solution using four yeast strains identified Pichia kudriavzevii TISTR 5147 (PK 5147) as the most efficient, achieving a 93.59% ethanol conversion—significantly outperforming Saccharomyces cerevisiae (20.95%), Kluyveromyces marxianus TISTR 5116 (5.96%), and K. marxianus TISTR 5616 (7.51%). Aspen Plus® simulations reveal that although PK 5147 requires 20–24% more distillation energy, its utility cost per ton of ethanol is substantially lower—22 times lower than TISTR 5116 and 13 times less than S. cerevisiae. Higher ethanol concentrations reduced purification energy, and solvent recycling further optimized process costs. Additional savings are achieved through the integration of high-temperature solvent and water recycling within the process design. The wide range of ethanol yields observed (5.96–93.59%) highlights the critical role of software-based cost estimation in evaluating experimental results during early-stage process design.
KW - Bioethanol
KW - Biorefinery
KW - Consolidated bioprocessing
KW - Fermentation efficiency
KW - Lignocellulosic biomass
KW - Process cost analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008971379
U2 - 10.14416/j.asep.2025.05.005
DO - 10.14416/j.asep.2025.05.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008971379
SN - 2672-9156
VL - 18
JO - Applied Science and Engineering Progress
JF - Applied Science and Engineering Progress
IS - 3
M1 - 7776
ER -