High level analysis of trade-offs across different partitioning schemes for wireless applications

P. Agrawal, R. Fasthuber, P. Raghavan, T. Vander Aa, U. Ahmad, L. Van Der Perre, F. Catthoor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the advent of heterogeneous MPSoC (Multi-Processors System-on-Chip) implementations of wireless applications, system partitioning and mapping has become a key challenge. To achieve efficient designs, system partitioning should simultaneously consider application characteristics, architecture constraints and physical design costs. It is also important to analyze the impact of partitioning on the system's area, energy and performance, as early as possible in the design flow. In this paper, we analyze the impact of different partitioning schemes for lattice reduction based MIMO detector. We show the trade-offs due to different partitioning schemes on area, energy and data parallelization factor for a given performance target for different number of processors. We carry out analysis based on high level estimates derived from the application and a set of characterized datapath and memory primitives for a template based architecture.

Original languageBritish English
Title of host publication2011 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, SiPS 2011, Proceedings
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages156-162
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9781457719219
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Event2011 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, SiPS 2011 - Beirut, Lebanon
Duration: 4 Oct 20117 Oct 2011

Publication series

Name2011 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, SiPS 2011, Proceedings

Conference

Conference2011 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, SiPS 2011
Country/TerritoryLebanon
CityBeirut
Period4/10/117/10/11

Keywords

  • Complexity Analysis
  • MIMO
  • MP-SoC
  • Partitioning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High level analysis of trade-offs across different partitioning schemes for wireless applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this