Heterogeneity and scatter effects on Ir-192 brachytherapy dose distribution

Alexander F.I. Osman, Nabil Maalej, Khateeb Ul-Rahman, Wamied Abdel Rahman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We studied the effects of the presence of an air cavity and scatter due to patient size on dose distribution near an Iriduim-192 brachytherapy source (Ir-192). The source was modeled using Monte Carlo (MC) code MCNP5. The Radial dose, gL(r), and the anisotropy function, F(r,θ) specified by the AAPM TG-43 have been determined and compared with the consensus data (AAPM report No. 229). We compared our MC results to the measured dose distribution using an EBT3 Gafchromic® film measurement. The dose was determined in the presence of an air cavity of 3, 5, and 7 mm diameters located at 2 mm distance from Ir-192. The dose was also determined for Ir-192 centered in 30 × 30 × 30 cm3 and 80 × 80 × 80 cm3 water phantoms. The MC results of gL(r) and F(r,θ) agreed with the consensus data to within 2% and 3%, respectively. The MC and the measured dose distributions agreed well with a maximum difference of 8.2% at the periphery of the film. The dose at 10 cm from the Ir-192 source with a full scattering medium (80 × 80 × 80 cm3) was 7% higher compared to the dose in (30 × 30 × 30 cm3) water phantom. The dose to water in the presence of a 3, 5, and 7 mm diameter air cavity increased by an average of 3%, 6%, and 9%, respectively, compared to the dose with no air cavity. Ignoring scatter effects and the heterogeneity correction in the presence of an air cavity can lead to significant errors in dose delivered to patients.

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)1210-1215
Number of pages6
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Air cavity
  • Brachytherapy
  • Dosimetry
  • Film
  • Monte Carlo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneity and scatter effects on Ir-192 brachytherapy dose distribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this