Abstract
We study the link between gravitational slopes and the surface morphology on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and provide constraints on the mechanical properties of the cometary material (tensile, shear, and compressive strengths). Methods. We computed the gravitational slopes for five regions on the nucleus that are representative of the different morphologies observed on the surface (Imhotep, Ash, Seth, Hathor, and Agilkia), using two shape models computed from OSIRIS images by the stereo-photoclinometry (SPC) and stereo-photogrammetry (SPG) techniques. We estimated the tensile, shear, and compressive strengths using different surface morphologies (overhangs, collapsed structures, boulders, cliffs, and Philae's footprint) and mechanical considerations. Results. The different regions show a similar general pattern in terms of the relation between gravitational slopes and terrain morphology: i) low-slope terrains (0-20°) are covered by a fine material and contain a few large (>10 m) and isolated boulders; ii) intermediate-slope terrains (20-45°) are mainly fallen consolidated materials and debris fields, with numerous intermediate-size boulders from <1 m to 10 m for the majority of them; and iii) high-slope terrains (45-90°) are cliffs that expose a consolidated material and do not show boulders or fine materials. The best range for the tensile strength of overhangs is 3-15 Pa (upper limit of 150 Pa), 4-30 Pa for the shear strength of fine surface materials and boulders, and 30-150 Pa for the compressive strength of overhangs (upper limit of 1500 Pa). The strength-to-gravity ratio is similar for 67P and weak rocks on Earth. As a result of the low compressive strength, the interior of the nucleus may have been compressed sufficiently to initiate diagenesis, which could have contributed to the formation of layers. Our value for the tensile strength is comparable to that of dust aggregates formed by gravitational instability and tends to favor a formation of comets by the accrection of pebbles at low velocities.
Original language | British English |
---|---|
Article number | A32 |
Journal | Astronomy and Astrophysics |
Volume | 583 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- Accretion, accretion disks
- Comets: general
- Comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
- Methods: data analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gravitational slopes, geomorphology, and material strengths of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 583, A32, 01.11.2015.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Gravitational slopes, geomorphology, and material strengths of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations
AU - Groussin, O.
AU - Jorda, L.
AU - Auger, A. T.
AU - Kuhrt, E.
AU - Gaskell, R.
AU - Capanna, C.
AU - Scholten, F.
AU - Preusker, F.
AU - Lamy, P.
AU - Hviid, S.
AU - Knollenberg, J.
AU - Keller, U.
AU - Huettig, C.
AU - Sierks, H.
AU - Barbieri, C.
AU - Rodrigo, R.
AU - Koschny, D.
AU - Rickman, H.
AU - A'Hearn, M. F.
AU - Agarwal, J.
AU - Barucci, M. A.
AU - Bertaux, J. L.
AU - Bertini, I.
AU - Boudreault, S.
AU - Cremonese, G.
AU - Da Deppo, V.
AU - Davidsson, B.
AU - Debei, S.
AU - De Cecco, M.
AU - El-Maarry, M. R.
AU - Fornasier, S.
AU - Fulle, M.
AU - Gutierrez, P. J.
AU - Guttler, C.
AU - Ip, W. H.
AU - Kramm, J. R.
AU - Kuppers, M.
AU - Lazzarin, M.
AU - Lara, L. M.
AU - Lopez Moreno, J. J.
AU - Marchi, S.
AU - Marzari, F.
AU - Massironi, M.
AU - Michalik, H.
AU - Naletto, G.
AU - Oklay, N.
AU - Pommerol, A.
AU - Pajola, M.
AU - Thomas, N.
AU - Toth, I.
AU - Tubiana, C.
AU - Vincent, J. B.
N1 - Funding Information: Groussin O. 1 Jorda L. 1 Auger A.-T. 1 2 Kührt E. 3 Gaskell R. 4 Capanna C. 1 Scholten F. 3 Preusker F. 3 Lamy P. 1 Hviid S. 3 Knollenberg J. 3 Keller U. 3 5 Huettig C. 3 Sierks H. 6 Barbieri C. 7 Rodrigo R. 8 9 Koschny D. 10 Rickman H. 11 12 A’Hearn M. F. 13 Agarwal J. 6 Barucci M. A. 14 Bertaux J.-L. 15 Bertini I. 16 Boudreault S. 6 Cremonese G. 17 Da Deppo V. 18 Davidsson B. 11 Debei S. 17 De Cecco M. 19 El-Maarry M. R. 20 Fornasier S. 14 Fulle M. 21 Gutiérrez P. J. 22 Güttler C. 6 Ip W.-H 23 Kramm J.-R. 6 Küppers M. 24 Lazzarin M. 7 Lara L. M. 22 Lopez Moreno J. J. 22 Marchi S. 25 Marzari F. 7 Massironi M. 16 26 Michalik H. 27 Naletto G. 16 18 28 Oklay N. 6 Pommerol A. 20 Pajola M. 16 Thomas N. 20 Toth I. 29 Tubiana C. 6 Vincent J.-B. 6 1 Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326 , 13388 Marseille , France 2 Laboratoire GEOPS (Géosciences Paris Sud), Bât. 509, Université Paris Sud , 91405 Orsay Cedex , France 3 Institute of Planetary Research , DLR, Rutherfordstrasse 2 , 12489 Berlin , Germany 4 Planetary Science Institute , Tucson , AZ 85721-0092 , USA 5 Institute for Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics , 38106 TU Braunschweig , Germany 6 Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung , 37077 Göttingen , Germany 7 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Padova University , Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3 , 35122 Padova , Italy 8 Centro de Astrobiologia (INTA-CSIC) , 28691 Villanueva de la Canada , Madrid , Spain 9 International Space Science Institute , Hallerstrasse 6 , 3012 Bern , Switzerland 10 Scientific Support Office, European Space Agency , 2201 Noordwijk , The Netherlands 11 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University , Box 516 , 75120 Uppsala , Sweden 12 PAS Space Research Center, Bartycka 18A , 00716 Warszawa , Poland 13 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland , College Park , MD 20742-2421 , USA 14 LESIA, Obs. de Paris, CNRS, Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris-Diderot , 5 place J. Janssen , 92195 Meudon , France 15 LATMOS, CNRS/UVSQ/IPSL , 11 boulevard d’Alembert , 78280 Guyancourt , France 16 Centro di Ateneo di Studi ed Attività Spaziali, “Giuseppe Colombo” (CISAS), University of Padova , via Venezia 15 , 35131 Padova , Italy 17 Department of Mech. Engineering University of Padova , via Venezia 1 , 35131 Padova , Italy 18 CNR-IFN UOS Padova LUXOR , via Trasea 7 , 35131 Padova , Italy 19 UNITN, Universit di Trento , via Mesiano, 77 , 38100 Trento , Italy 20 Physikalisches Institut, Sidlerstr. 5, University of Bern , 3012 Bern , Switzerland 21 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico , via Tiepolo 11 , 34143 Trieste , Italy 22 Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucía (CSIC) , Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n , 18008 Granada , Spain 23 Institute for Space Science, Nat. Central Univ. , 300 Chung Da Rd., 32054 , Chung-Li , Taiwan 24 Operations Department, European Space Astronomy Centre/ESA , PO Box 78 , 28691 Villanueva de la Canada , Madrid , Spain 25 Southwest Research Institute , 1050 Walnut St. , Boulder , CO 80302 , USA 26 INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova , 35122 Padova , Italy 27 Institut für Datentechnik und Kommunikationsnetze der TU Braunschweig , Hans-Sommer-Str. 66 , 38106 Braunschweig , Germany 28 University of Padova, Department of Information Engineering , via Gradenigo 6/B , 35131 Padova , Italy 29 Konkoly Observatory , PO Box 67 , 1525 Budapest , Hungary e-mail: [email protected] 30 10 2015 30 10 2015 11 2015 583 aa/2015/11 Funding Information: A32 22 4 2015 14 7 2015 © ESO, 2015 2015 ESO Aims. We study the link between gravitational slopes and the surface morphology on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and provide constraints on the mechanical properties of the cometary material (tensile, shear, and compressive strengths). Methods. We computed the gravitational slopes for five regions on the nucleus that are representative of the different morphologies observed on the surface (Imhotep, Ash, Seth, Hathor, and Agilkia), using two shape models computed from OSIRIS images by the stereo-photoclinometry (SPC) and stereo-photogrammetry (SPG) techniques. We estimated the tensile, shear, and compressive strengths using different surface morphologies (overhangs, collapsed structures, boulders, cliffs, and Philae’s footprint) and mechanical considerations. Results. The different regions show a similar general pattern in terms of the relation between gravitational slopes and terrain morphology: i) low-slope terrains (0 − 20 ° ) are covered by a fine material and contain a few large ( > 10 m) and isolated boulders; ii) intermediate-slope terrains (20 − 45 ° ) are mainly fallen consolidated materials and debris fields, with numerous intermediate-size boulders from < 1 m to 10 m for the majority of them; and iii) high-slope terrains (45 − 90 ° ) are cliffs that expose a consolidated material and do not show boulders or fine materials. The best range for the tensile strength of overhangs is 3 − 15 Pa (upper limit of 150 Pa), 4 − 30 Pa for the shear strength of fine surface materials and boulders, and 30 − 150 Pa for the compressive strength of overhangs (upper limit of 1500 Pa). The strength-to-gravity ratio is similar for 67P and weak rocks on Earth. As a result of the low compressive strength, the interior of the nucleus may have been compressed sufficiently to initiate diagenesis, which could have contributed to the formation of layers. Our value for the tensile strength is comparable to that of dust aggregates formed by gravitational instability and tends to favor a formation of comets by the accrection of pebbles at low velocities. comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko comets: general accretion, accretion disks methods: data analysis idline A&A 583, A32 (2015) cover_date November 2015 first_month 11 last_month 11 first_year 2015 last_year 2015 OSIRIS was built by a consortium of the Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany; CISAS University of Padova, Italy; the Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, France; the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucia, CSIC, Granada, Spain; the Research and Scientific Support Department of the ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands; the Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial, Madrid, Spain; the Universidad Politéchnica de Madrid, Spain; the Department of Physics and Astronomy of Uppsala University, Sweden; and the Institut für Datentechnik und Kommunikationsnetze der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Germany. The support of the national funding agencies of Germany (DLR), France (CNES), Italy (ASI), Spain (MEC), Sweden (SNSB), and the ESA Technical Directorate is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the Rosetta Science Operations Centre and the Rosetta Mission Operations Centre for the successful rendezvous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. We thank David Romeuf from the University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (France) for creating the red/blue anaglyph in Fig. 11. We thank the referee, J. Blum, for his helpful and constructive report. Publisher Copyright: © 2015 ESO.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - We study the link between gravitational slopes and the surface morphology on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and provide constraints on the mechanical properties of the cometary material (tensile, shear, and compressive strengths). Methods. We computed the gravitational slopes for five regions on the nucleus that are representative of the different morphologies observed on the surface (Imhotep, Ash, Seth, Hathor, and Agilkia), using two shape models computed from OSIRIS images by the stereo-photoclinometry (SPC) and stereo-photogrammetry (SPG) techniques. We estimated the tensile, shear, and compressive strengths using different surface morphologies (overhangs, collapsed structures, boulders, cliffs, and Philae's footprint) and mechanical considerations. Results. The different regions show a similar general pattern in terms of the relation between gravitational slopes and terrain morphology: i) low-slope terrains (0-20°) are covered by a fine material and contain a few large (>10 m) and isolated boulders; ii) intermediate-slope terrains (20-45°) are mainly fallen consolidated materials and debris fields, with numerous intermediate-size boulders from <1 m to 10 m for the majority of them; and iii) high-slope terrains (45-90°) are cliffs that expose a consolidated material and do not show boulders or fine materials. The best range for the tensile strength of overhangs is 3-15 Pa (upper limit of 150 Pa), 4-30 Pa for the shear strength of fine surface materials and boulders, and 30-150 Pa for the compressive strength of overhangs (upper limit of 1500 Pa). The strength-to-gravity ratio is similar for 67P and weak rocks on Earth. As a result of the low compressive strength, the interior of the nucleus may have been compressed sufficiently to initiate diagenesis, which could have contributed to the formation of layers. Our value for the tensile strength is comparable to that of dust aggregates formed by gravitational instability and tends to favor a formation of comets by the accrection of pebbles at low velocities.
AB - We study the link between gravitational slopes and the surface morphology on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and provide constraints on the mechanical properties of the cometary material (tensile, shear, and compressive strengths). Methods. We computed the gravitational slopes for five regions on the nucleus that are representative of the different morphologies observed on the surface (Imhotep, Ash, Seth, Hathor, and Agilkia), using two shape models computed from OSIRIS images by the stereo-photoclinometry (SPC) and stereo-photogrammetry (SPG) techniques. We estimated the tensile, shear, and compressive strengths using different surface morphologies (overhangs, collapsed structures, boulders, cliffs, and Philae's footprint) and mechanical considerations. Results. The different regions show a similar general pattern in terms of the relation between gravitational slopes and terrain morphology: i) low-slope terrains (0-20°) are covered by a fine material and contain a few large (>10 m) and isolated boulders; ii) intermediate-slope terrains (20-45°) are mainly fallen consolidated materials and debris fields, with numerous intermediate-size boulders from <1 m to 10 m for the majority of them; and iii) high-slope terrains (45-90°) are cliffs that expose a consolidated material and do not show boulders or fine materials. The best range for the tensile strength of overhangs is 3-15 Pa (upper limit of 150 Pa), 4-30 Pa for the shear strength of fine surface materials and boulders, and 30-150 Pa for the compressive strength of overhangs (upper limit of 1500 Pa). The strength-to-gravity ratio is similar for 67P and weak rocks on Earth. As a result of the low compressive strength, the interior of the nucleus may have been compressed sufficiently to initiate diagenesis, which could have contributed to the formation of layers. Our value for the tensile strength is comparable to that of dust aggregates formed by gravitational instability and tends to favor a formation of comets by the accrection of pebbles at low velocities.
KW - Accretion, accretion disks
KW - Comets: general
KW - Comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
KW - Methods: data analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946569838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526379
DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526379
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84946569838
SN - 0004-6361
VL - 583
JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics
M1 - A32
ER -