Effects of membrane orientation on process performance in forward osmosis applications

Shuaifei Zhao, Linda Zou, Dennis Mulcahy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

183 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forward osmosis (FO) has attracted growing attention for its great promise in desalination, wastewater treatment, liquid food processing and power generation. However, there is no clear agreement on the selection of membrane orientation in these applications. This study investigates the effects of membrane orientation on FO performance in saline water desalination without fouling, and with inorganic or organic fouling. The results show that the feed solution component and the concentration degree could influence the selection of membrane orientation. When severe membrane fouling or scaling occurs, the isoflux point occurs relatively early and FO mode (active layer facing the feed) provides a more stable and higher water flux than that in the alternative membrane orientation, i.e. pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) mode (support layer facing the feed). Additionally, lower fouling but higher cleaning efficiency is observed in FO mode compared with PRO mode. Therefore, in the applications of treating feed solutions with higher fouling/scaling tendencies (e.g. wastewater treatment) or treating higher salinity water (e.g. seawater desalination), FO mode is more favourable. While PRO mode is preferred when using the solutions with lower fouling/scaling tendencies as the feed (e.g. brackish water desalination), or where intensive concentration is unnecessary (e.g. power generation).

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)308-315
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume382
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Desalination
  • Forward osmosis
  • Fouling
  • Internal concentration polarization
  • Wastewater treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of membrane orientation on process performance in forward osmosis applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this