TY - JOUR
T1 - Drone usage by militant groups
T2 - Exploring variation in adoption
AU - Rossiter, Ash
N1 - Funding Information:
The author wishes to thank Andrew Ross, Erik Dahl, and Brendon Cannon, as well as panel participants at the annual ISSS-ISAC conference in Washington DC in October 2017, for their helpful comments on an early draft of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - Judging by recent media reporting and pronouncements by senior US military and security officials, the use of drones by militant groups is both reshaping conflict between armed non-state actors and state parties and now presents a grave and direct threat to nations in the West and elsewhere. But does this threat warrant the attention it is currently receiving? To answer this question, this article surveys how various militant groups have used drones both tactically on the battlefield and for wider strategic purposes. Closely examining how drones have been employed and by whom provides a basis for understanding variation in adoption. The article shows how drone usage or non-usage is highly contingent on the setting of the conflict, the aims of different groups, and the capacity of groups to adopt the technology. Though advances in drone technology could make the use-case more appealing for militant groups, drones will be subject to the same back-and-forth, techno-tactical adaptation dynamic between adversaries that have accompanied prior military innovations.
AB - Judging by recent media reporting and pronouncements by senior US military and security officials, the use of drones by militant groups is both reshaping conflict between armed non-state actors and state parties and now presents a grave and direct threat to nations in the West and elsewhere. But does this threat warrant the attention it is currently receiving? To answer this question, this article surveys how various militant groups have used drones both tactically on the battlefield and for wider strategic purposes. Closely examining how drones have been employed and by whom provides a basis for understanding variation in adoption. The article shows how drone usage or non-usage is highly contingent on the setting of the conflict, the aims of different groups, and the capacity of groups to adopt the technology. Though advances in drone technology could make the use-case more appealing for militant groups, drones will be subject to the same back-and-forth, techno-tactical adaptation dynamic between adversaries that have accompanied prior military innovations.
KW - Adoption capacity theory
KW - Countermeasures
KW - Diffusion of innovation
KW - Drones
KW - Low-intensity conflict
KW - Militants
KW - Non-state actors
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048802155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14751798.2018.1478183
DO - 10.1080/14751798.2018.1478183
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048802155
SN - 1475-1798
VL - 34
SP - 113
EP - 126
JO - Defense and Security Analysis
JF - Defense and Security Analysis
IS - 2
ER -