CO2 purification. Part II: Techno-economic evaluation of oxygen and water deep removal processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

According to the findings of the first part of this work, the two impurities in the CO2 stream, from post-combustion capture, which require deep removal, are oxygen and water, down to 10 and 50ppmv, respectively. In addition, a review and preliminary evaluation of the possible technologies which can be used for oxygen and water deep removal were conducted. The results showed that the promising technologies are: catalytic oxidation of hydrogen for oxygen removal and refrigeration and condensation for water removal. In this paper, detailed process modeling, design and a techno-economic evaluation are performed on these two technologies. Both selected technologies were designed and proved their potential by reducing the impurities to the required levels with a total cost of treating and compressing one ton of CO2 of $13.09 for the coal-fired power plant full purification case and $17.23 for the NGCC full purification process. The cost of CO2 compression without the purification step was found to be approximately $10.12/ton of CO2 for the coal-fired case and $11.98/ton CO2 for the NGCC case. This means that adding the purification technologies will increase the cost of CO2 compression by around 29.3% for the coal-fired case and 43.8% for the NGCC case. Assuming a total CO2 capture and compression cost of $73-94/ton of CO2 shows that the total CO2 purification cost is roughly 3-4% of the overall capture cost for the coal-fired case and 5.5-7% for the NGCC case.

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)335-341
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Volume16
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Keywords

  • Techno-economic evaluation
  • Water and oxygen removal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CO2 purification. Part II: Techno-economic evaluation of oxygen and water deep removal processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this