Corrigendum: Post-pandemic planning: do we have enough and efficient access to parks? (Front. Built Environ., (2023), 9, 1158430, 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1158430)

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 2 as published. The legend includes a spelling mistake in the word “Aterials.” The correct spelling is “Arterials” and the legend in Figure 2 has been updated to display the correct spelling as “Arterials & Collectors.” The corrected legend appears below. Selected samples showing parks’ locations and the 1-km distance-based service area. In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. In Table 1, the values in the column titled “Arterials/Collectors Percentage” are incorrectly displayed as zeros for the following samples: Al Rahba, AL Shawamekh, Al Falah, Al Shahma, Shakhbout-2, and MBZ. The correct percentages for arterials and collectors in these samples have been revised as follows: Al Rahba at 34.40, AL Shawamekh at 38.81, Al Falah at 45.82, Al Shahma at 32.20, Shakhbout-2 at 47.12, and MBZ at 52.33. The corrected Table 1 and its caption “Quantified physical attributes for the streets only network scenario” appear below. Quantified physical attributes for the streets only network scenario. In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. In Table 2, the value in the column titled “Network Density” for the East-AD sample was incorrectly listed as 0.18. This has now been revised, and the correct network density value for the East-AD sample is 0.46. The corrected Table 2 and its caption “Quantified physical attributes for the streets and alleyways network scenario” appear below. Quantified physical attributes for the streets and alleyways network scenario. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.