Correction to: Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger (CNLS) equations for two interacting electrostatic wavepackets in a non-Maxwellian fluid plasma model(Nonlinear Dyn, (2024), 112, (2795–2819), 10.1007/s11071-023-09165-4)

The authors regret to have to point out that a few typographical errors slipped through their article [N. Lazarides and I. Kourakis, Nonlinear Dynamics (2024) 112:2795–2819]. It is emphasized that the errors are limited to the respective algebraic relations where they appear, and that the results reported in the article remain entirely unaffected by these errors. In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕ_j in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~_j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ_1,0ϕ₁ and Ψ_1,0ϕ₂ should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to g_j makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of ε_j in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.) In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕ_j in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~_j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ_1,0ϕ₁ and Ψ_1,0ϕ₂ should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to g_j makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of ε_j in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.)