TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Coupled nonlinear Schrödinger (CNLS) equations for two interacting electrostatic wavepackets in a non-Maxwellian fluid plasma model(Nonlinear Dyn, (2024), 112, (2795–2819), 10.1007/s11071-023-09165-4)

AU - Lazarides, N.

AU - Kourakis, Ioannis

N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/6

Y1 - 2024/6

N2 - The authors regret to have to point out that a few typographical errors slipped through their article [N. Lazarides and I. Kourakis, Nonlinear Dynamics (2024) 112:2795–2819]. It is emphasized that the errors are limited to the respective algebraic relations where they appear, and that the results reported in the article remain entirely unaffected by these errors. In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕj in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ1,0ϕ1 and Ψ1,0ϕ2 should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to gj makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of εj in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.) In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕj in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ1,0ϕ1 and Ψ1,0ϕ2 should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to gj makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of εj in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.)

AB - The authors regret to have to point out that a few typographical errors slipped through their article [N. Lazarides and I. Kourakis, Nonlinear Dynamics (2024) 112:2795–2819]. It is emphasized that the errors are limited to the respective algebraic relations where they appear, and that the results reported in the article remain entirely unaffected by these errors. In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕj in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ1,0ϕ1 and Ψ1,0ϕ2 should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to gj makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of εj in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.) In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (70) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e., ϕj in Eq. (70) should be replaced by ω~j defined in Eqs. (68) and (69). In page 2806 (right column) Eqs. (71) and (72) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) i.e, the terms Ψ1,0ϕ1 and Ψ1,0ϕ2 should be absent. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (75) in our article (Formula presented.) should read (Formula presented.) where “c.c.” denotes the complex conjugate. The addition of the complex conjugate to gj makes that quantity real, as it should read(as per its definition as the real part of εj in the two lines following Eq. (72) in our article. In page 2806 (right column) Eq. (78) in our article, (Formula presented.) should instead read (Formula presented.)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190238574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11071-024-09535-6

DO - 10.1007/s11071-024-09535-6

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85190238574

SN - 0924-090X

VL - 112

SP - 9723

EP - 9724

JO - Nonlinear Dynamics

JF - Nonlinear Dynamics

IS - 11

ER -