Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A randomized clinical trial

J. A. Rock; C. A. Bergquist; A. W. Kimball; H. A. Zacur; T. M. King

doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3

Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A randomized clinical trial

J. A. Rock
, C. A. Bergquist
, A. W. Kimball
, H. A. Zacur
, T. M. King

College of Medicine and Health Sciences

The Johns Hopkins Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients with pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.

Original language	British English
Pages (from-to)	229-232
Number of pages	4
Journal	Fertility and Sterility
Volume	41
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3
State	Published - 1984

Access to Document

10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3

Cite this

@article{951274b754ec4bada41d39b3d18cd352,

title = "Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A randomized clinical trial",

abstract = "Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients with pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.",

author = "Rock, \{J. A.\} and Bergquist, \{C. A.\} and Kimball, \{A. W.\} and Zacur, \{H. A.\} and King, \{T. M.\}",

year = "1984",

doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3",

language = "British English",

volume = "41",

pages = "229--232",

journal = "Fertility and Sterility",

issn = "0015-0282",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis

T2 - A randomized clinical trial

AU - Rock, J. A.

AU - Bergquist, C. A.

AU - Kimball, A. W.

AU - Zacur, H. A.

AU - King, T. M.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients with pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.

AB - Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients with pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0021282254

U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3

DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47595-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 6365599

AN - SCOPUS:0021282254

SN - 0015-0282

VL - 41

SP - 229

EP - 232

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

IS - 2

ER -

Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this