Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate

P. Compston; W. J. Cantwell; M. J. Cardew-Hall; S. Kalyanasundaram; L. Mosse

doi:10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72

Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate

P. Compston, W. J. Cantwell, M. J. Cardew-Hall, S. Kalyanasundaram, L. Mosse

Aerospace Engineering

Australian National University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

The permanent strain on the surface of a channel-formed aluminum-polypropylene laminate was compared to monolithic aluminum. The materials used in this study were 5005-H34 aluminum and a self-reinforced polypropylene (Curv, BP). Microscopic examination of the sidewall edge, prior to taking the strain measurements, confirmed the absence of delamination. The results show that the aluminum-Curv laminate exhibits low strain and is not influenced by a change in tool radii, which makes it efficient to solve the problems associated with stamping of traditional monolithic metals.

Original language	British English
Pages (from-to)	6087-6088
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Materials Science
Volume	39
Issue number	19
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72
State	Published - Oct 2004

Access to Document

10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72

Cite this

@article{d0790c930b1b4ce9a9afcc82129d44bf,

title = "Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate",

abstract = "The permanent strain on the surface of a channel-formed aluminum-polypropylene laminate was compared to monolithic aluminum. The materials used in this study were 5005-H34 aluminum and a self-reinforced polypropylene (Curv, BP). Microscopic examination of the sidewall edge, prior to taking the strain measurements, confirmed the absence of delamination. The results show that the aluminum-Curv laminate exhibits low strain and is not influenced by a change in tool radii, which makes it efficient to solve the problems associated with stamping of traditional monolithic metals.",

author = "P. Compston and Cantwell, {W. J.} and Cardew-Hall, {M. J.} and S. Kalyanasundaram and L. Mosse",

year = "2004",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72",

language = "British English",

volume = "39",

pages = "6087--6088",

journal = "Journal of Materials Science",

issn = "0022-2461",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate

AU - Compston, P.

AU - Cantwell, W. J.

AU - Cardew-Hall, M. J.

AU - Kalyanasundaram, S.

AU - Mosse, L.

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - The permanent strain on the surface of a channel-formed aluminum-polypropylene laminate was compared to monolithic aluminum. The materials used in this study were 5005-H34 aluminum and a self-reinforced polypropylene (Curv, BP). Microscopic examination of the sidewall edge, prior to taking the strain measurements, confirmed the absence of delamination. The results show that the aluminum-Curv laminate exhibits low strain and is not influenced by a change in tool radii, which makes it efficient to solve the problems associated with stamping of traditional monolithic metals.

AB - The permanent strain on the surface of a channel-formed aluminum-polypropylene laminate was compared to monolithic aluminum. The materials used in this study were 5005-H34 aluminum and a self-reinforced polypropylene (Curv, BP). Microscopic examination of the sidewall edge, prior to taking the strain measurements, confirmed the absence of delamination. The results show that the aluminum-Curv laminate exhibits low strain and is not influenced by a change in tool radii, which makes it efficient to solve the problems associated with stamping of traditional monolithic metals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544346215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72

DO - 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4544346215

SN - 0022-2461

VL - 39

SP - 6087

EP - 6088

JO - Journal of Materials Science

JF - Journal of Materials Science

IS - 19

ER -

Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this