Comparative Analysis of Space Vector Pulse-Width Modulation Techniques of Three-Phase Inverter to Minimize Common Mode Voltage and/or Switching Losses

Kotb B. Tawfiq, Peter Sergeant, Arafa S. Mansour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Inverter-based systems encounter significant challenges in mitigating common-mode voltage (CMV) and minimizing inverter losses. Despite various space vector pulse-width modulation (SVPWM) techniques proposed to address these issues, a comprehensive comparative analysis has been lacking. This paper addresses this gap through an experimental and simulation-based evaluation of nine SVPWM techniques. A new discontinuous SVPWM technique, DSVPWM-K4, is introduced, which involves reversing the use of the two zero vectors in DSVPWM-K3. DSVPWM-K3 delivers superior performance in terms of CMV reduction, total harmonic distortion (THD), and inverter losses across all modulation indices (MI = 1, 0.75, 0.5, and 0.25), making it the most effective overall. Although DSVPWM-K4 is a novel approach, it ranks second in effectiveness. The RSPWM technique achieves the lowest CMV with a zero peak-to-peak value but is most effective at lower modulation indices (0.25 and 0.5) due to higher harmonic distortion at higher modulation indices. AZSPWM performs optimally at higher modulation indices, providing a 66.66% reduction in CMV compared to continuous SVPWM and significantly lower THD compared to RSPWM. In contrast, NSPWM exhibits nearly double the THD compared to continuous SVPWM.

Original languageBritish English
Article number2832
JournalMathematics
Volume12
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • AZSPWM
  • CMV
  • DSVPWM
  • inverter losses
  • RSPWM
  • RSPWM
  • SPWM
  • SVPWM
  • THD
  • three-phase inverter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Space Vector Pulse-Width Modulation Techniques of Three-Phase Inverter to Minimize Common Mode Voltage and/or Switching Losses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this