Collusive conduct in private label markets

Namwoon Kim, Philip M. Parker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This paper considers retailers' pricing strategies when they sell both nationally-advertised brands and quality-equivalent private-label brands (a form of store, house or own-label branding). We investigate the impact of advertising on the ability of retailers to increase profitability across all brands. Supporting recent theoretical arguments (though contradicting others), our industry study reveals that retailers can react to the heavy advertising amongst national brands by increasing prices, revenues, and economic profits generated from both national brands and private-label brands. For the category studied, retailers' strategies may include setting collusive prices for both national brands and private-label brands. We use a structural test to support this conclusion. Management interviews further support this finding.

    Original languageBritish English
    Pages (from-to)143-155
    Number of pages13
    JournalInternational Journal of Research in Marketing
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1999

    Keywords

    • Advertising
    • Collusion
    • Market power
    • Price
    • Private-label brands
    • Retailing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Collusive conduct in private label markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this