TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridgeless PFC Topology Simplification and Design for Performance Benchmarking
AU - Chen, Zhengge
AU - Liu, Bochen
AU - Yang, Yongheng
AU - Davari, Pooya
AU - Wang, Huai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1986-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Compared with conventional power factor correction topologies, although dual-converter cell-based bridgeless topologies usually have higher efficiency, most of them suffer from high component counts. Thus, this article proposes general topology simplification methods for these topologies. Besides, several selected converter cells are exemplified to show the specific topology simplification processes, and the performance of the resultant simplified topologies is reviewed. Meanwhile, based on the same design specifications, in order to provide an unbiased quantitative topology comparison in terms of power loss, cost, and volume, this article introduces a consistent component database-based design procedure with electrical, thermal, and cost models. As case studies, the conventional and two selected bridgeless buck-boost-type topologies are compared by following the design procedure. The comparison results are analyzed to provide a reference for topology selection. Three prototypes are built and tested to verify the theoretical analysis.
AB - Compared with conventional power factor correction topologies, although dual-converter cell-based bridgeless topologies usually have higher efficiency, most of them suffer from high component counts. Thus, this article proposes general topology simplification methods for these topologies. Besides, several selected converter cells are exemplified to show the specific topology simplification processes, and the performance of the resultant simplified topologies is reviewed. Meanwhile, based on the same design specifications, in order to provide an unbiased quantitative topology comparison in terms of power loss, cost, and volume, this article introduces a consistent component database-based design procedure with electrical, thermal, and cost models. As case studies, the conventional and two selected bridgeless buck-boost-type topologies are compared by following the design procedure. The comparison results are analyzed to provide a reference for topology selection. Three prototypes are built and tested to verify the theoretical analysis.
KW - Bridgeless converters
KW - buck-boost converter
KW - comparison
KW - consistent design
KW - power factor correction (PFC)
KW - topology simplification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100563759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3028419
DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3028419
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100563759
SN - 0885-8993
VL - 36
SP - 5398
EP - 5414
JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
IS - 5
M1 - 9211796
ER -