Application of fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of north american and south african blacks and whites,

Ericka N. L'Abbé, Michael Kenyhercz, Kyra E. Stull, Natalie Keough, Stephen Nawrocki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using discriminant function analysis, classification accuracies for ancestry and sex in white and black South Africans were compared using North American (FDB), African groups in Howells (HDB), and South African (SADB) databases in FORDISC 3.0. (FD3). Twenty-four standard linear measures were collected from a total of 86 black and 101 white crania obtained from the Pretoria Bone Collection. White and black South Africans classified 73% correctly in FDB, 55% correctly in HDB, and 71% correctly in SADB. The percentage of atypical cases was higher with FDB than SADB. In all three databases, misclassification occurred more with sex than ancestry revealing differences in sexual dimorphism between population groups. Broad ancestral differences may explain low misclassification rates for ancestry. FD3, with a modern South African reference sample, can assist South African anthropologists to standardize methodology and to justify procedures for estimating ancestry.

Original languageBritish English
Pages (from-to)1579-1583
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Ancestry
  • Discriminant analysis
  • Forensic anthropology
  • Forensic science
  • Population specific
  • South Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Application of fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of north american and south african blacks and whites,'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this