TY - JOUR
T1 - An experimental study of vortex-flame interaction in counterflow spray diffusion flames
AU - Santoro, Vito S.
AU - Kyritsis, Dimitrios C.
AU - Gomez, Alessandro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the following colleagues: Mr. Ernst Ebert, for the design and construction of the vortex generation system and its retrofitting to the counterflow burner; Mr. Mikhail Noskov, for preliminary calculations that enabled us to use HCHO as a flame marker; Dr. Adon-ios N. Karpetis, for helping with aspects of the data acquisition; and Professor Amable Linan, for enhancing our understanding of flame structure issues. The support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, under the Microgravity Science and Applications Program, grant no. NAG3-1688 (Mr. Dennis Stocker, contract monitor), and of the National Science Foundation, grant no. CTS-9904296 (Dr. Farley Fisher, contract monitor), is gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The extinction behavior of methanol counterflow spray diffusion flames was investigated using a combination of formaldehyde planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) and phase Doppler measurements. Extinction was brought about quasi-steadily, by progressively increasing the flow rates of both oxidizer and fuel side, and unsteadily, by generating a vortex on the oxidizer side. The unsteady experiments yielded values of extinction strain rates a factor of 2 larger than the quasi-steady values. The greater robustness of the spray flame under unsteady perturbation was explained phenomenologically by estimating the timescales involved in the process. It was found that the vortex introduces unsteady effects in the outer diffusiveconvective layer of the flame. The inner reactive-diffusive layer, on the other hand, behaves in a quasisteady manner, since the characteristic chemical time is much smaller than the characteristic unsteady time. As a result, even though the instantaneous strain rate is much larger than the quasi-steadyextinction strain rate, the flame is subject to a damped strain rate through the outer layer. An estimate of the thickness of the mixing layer, based on formaldehyde PLIF, provided a convenient means to compare the scalar dissipation rate and the Damköhler number between the two extinction modes, bypassing the need for detailed species measurements for the assessment of the mixture fraction and its gradient. Such a comparison showed that the difference between the two extinction modes was reduced to 25% on the average, consistent with expectations based on flame structure models from asymptotic theory. Spray flames exhibited longer time delays between the onset of extinction and reignition, as compared to gaseous flames. Estimates of the relevant Stokes number suggested that the difference may be attributed to droplet inertia effects.
AB - The extinction behavior of methanol counterflow spray diffusion flames was investigated using a combination of formaldehyde planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) and phase Doppler measurements. Extinction was brought about quasi-steadily, by progressively increasing the flow rates of both oxidizer and fuel side, and unsteadily, by generating a vortex on the oxidizer side. The unsteady experiments yielded values of extinction strain rates a factor of 2 larger than the quasi-steady values. The greater robustness of the spray flame under unsteady perturbation was explained phenomenologically by estimating the timescales involved in the process. It was found that the vortex introduces unsteady effects in the outer diffusiveconvective layer of the flame. The inner reactive-diffusive layer, on the other hand, behaves in a quasisteady manner, since the characteristic chemical time is much smaller than the characteristic unsteady time. As a result, even though the instantaneous strain rate is much larger than the quasi-steadyextinction strain rate, the flame is subject to a damped strain rate through the outer layer. An estimate of the thickness of the mixing layer, based on formaldehyde PLIF, provided a convenient means to compare the scalar dissipation rate and the Damköhler number between the two extinction modes, bypassing the need for detailed species measurements for the assessment of the mixture fraction and its gradient. Such a comparison showed that the difference between the two extinction modes was reduced to 25% on the average, consistent with expectations based on flame structure models from asymptotic theory. Spray flames exhibited longer time delays between the onset of extinction and reignition, as compared to gaseous flames. Estimates of the relevant Stokes number suggested that the difference may be attributed to droplet inertia effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915735443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80310-0
DO - 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80310-0
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84915735443
SN - 1540-7489
VL - 28
SP - 1023
EP - 1030
JO - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
JF - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
IS - 1
T2 - 30th International Symposium on Combustion
Y2 - 25 July 2004 through 30 July 2004
ER -