TY - GEN
T1 - A Methodology for Developing and Evaluating FBG-Based Smart 3D-Printed Prosthetics
AU - Kosaji, Doua Jamal
AU - Al-Rahmani, Nour
AU - Abdallah, Fatima
AU - Alhmoudi, Mariam
AU - Aljaberi, Maryam
AU - Al-Ali, Rashed
AU - Awad, Mohammad I.
AU - Khalaf, Kinda
AU - Domingues, M. Fatima
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Lower limb amputation can greatly impact mobility and overall well-being. While recent advancements in 3D printing offer affordable and customizable prosthetics, maintaining structural integrity, performance, and accurate pressure measurements is essential. This study explores the use of Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors in 3D-printed prosthetics for real-time deformation monitoring. After modeling the prosthetic, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used to identify critical stress areas. These areas were then segmented and modeled, including a U-shaped segment for the metatarsal region and two linear segments at varying depths (0.4mm and 0.8mm). Our results show that the 0.8mm deep sensor demonstrated superior weight tolerance and response consistency compared to the 0.4mm deep sensor. This depth enabled more effective strain monitoring, enhancing response, recovery, and the reliability of the prosthetic. As for the U-shaped segments, both horizontally and vertically positioned sensors displayed rapid recovery and could bear maximum weight before reaching potential failure points.
AB - Lower limb amputation can greatly impact mobility and overall well-being. While recent advancements in 3D printing offer affordable and customizable prosthetics, maintaining structural integrity, performance, and accurate pressure measurements is essential. This study explores the use of Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors in 3D-printed prosthetics for real-time deformation monitoring. After modeling the prosthetic, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used to identify critical stress areas. These areas were then segmented and modeled, including a U-shaped segment for the metatarsal region and two linear segments at varying depths (0.4mm and 0.8mm). Our results show that the 0.8mm deep sensor demonstrated superior weight tolerance and response consistency compared to the 0.4mm deep sensor. This depth enabled more effective strain monitoring, enhancing response, recovery, and the reliability of the prosthetic. As for the U-shaped segments, both horizontally and vertically positioned sensors displayed rapid recovery and could bear maximum weight before reaching potential failure points.
KW - 3D Print
KW - Fiber Bragg Gratings
KW - Lower Limb Prosthesis
KW - Optical Fiber Sensors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215306122
U2 - 10.1109/SENSORS60989.2024.10784581
DO - 10.1109/SENSORS60989.2024.10784581
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85215306122
T3 - Proceedings of IEEE Sensors
BT - 2024 IEEE Sensors, SENSORS 2024 - Conference Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 IEEE Sensors, SENSORS 2024
Y2 - 20 October 2024 through 23 October 2024
ER -