TY - GEN
T1 - A Critical Analysis on EEG Signal Processing for BCI Applications
AU - Patole, Shashikant P.
AU - Patankar, Mamta
AU - Chaurasia, Vijayshri
AU - Shandilya, Madhu
AU - Mahadeva, Rajesh
AU - Sharma, Praveen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - An overview of the brain-computer interface is given in this publication and the variety of deep learning architectures for the acquisition of brain signals we have discussed the EEG signals that are used in BCI applications. Time-frequency localization is frequently poor in EEG signals. As a result, BCI systems frequently have low task detection accuracy and high error rates. It also exhibits extremely quasi qualities and has a lot of trans variances. Additionally, we have discussed noise removal techniques given by different researchers from EEG signals and BCI applications, and the comparison is given further than we have discussed regarding the EEG signal's image retrieval and different deep learning techniques for EEG learning commons. From the analysis of the results of different approaches, it's been noticed that non-stationary EEG signals are more contributing to BCI applications. Whereas, in pre-processing steps, SWT-ICA, DWT, and CSP algorithms are most efficient for noise removal. For feature extraction sliding window spatial and temporal methods and deep learning methods contributed the most. Finally, for feature learning and classification, transfer learning and fine-tuned model performance were analyzed. It was observed from the analytical review that the fine-tuned transfer learning model outperforms better.
AB - An overview of the brain-computer interface is given in this publication and the variety of deep learning architectures for the acquisition of brain signals we have discussed the EEG signals that are used in BCI applications. Time-frequency localization is frequently poor in EEG signals. As a result, BCI systems frequently have low task detection accuracy and high error rates. It also exhibits extremely quasi qualities and has a lot of trans variances. Additionally, we have discussed noise removal techniques given by different researchers from EEG signals and BCI applications, and the comparison is given further than we have discussed regarding the EEG signal's image retrieval and different deep learning techniques for EEG learning commons. From the analysis of the results of different approaches, it's been noticed that non-stationary EEG signals are more contributing to BCI applications. Whereas, in pre-processing steps, SWT-ICA, DWT, and CSP algorithms are most efficient for noise removal. For feature extraction sliding window spatial and temporal methods and deep learning methods contributed the most. Finally, for feature learning and classification, transfer learning and fine-tuned model performance were analyzed. It was observed from the analytical review that the fine-tuned transfer learning model outperforms better.
KW - BCI applications
KW - EEG
KW - Feature Extraction
KW - Motor Imaginary Tasks
KW - Noise Removal
KW - Transfer Learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004553004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IHCSP63227.2024.10960256
DO - 10.1109/IHCSP63227.2024.10960256
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105004553004
T3 - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Innovations in High-Speed Communication and Signal Processing, IHCSP 2024
BT - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Innovations in High-Speed Communication and Signal Processing, IHCSP 2024
A2 - Kumre, Laxmi
A2 - Chaurasia, Vijayshri
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Innovations in High-Speed Communication and Signal Processing, IHCSP 2024
Y2 - 6 December 2024 through 8 December 2024
ER -