Abstract
Four permanent magnet machine topologies -A traditional surface mounted permanent magnet machine (SMPM), a heterogeneous pole permanent magnet machine (HPM), an asymmetric salient surface mounted permanent magnet machine (APM), and an interior permanent magnet machine (IPM) -Are compared for use in an electric ship propulsion application. Using a multi-objective design approach coupled with analytical and hybrid magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) models and a highly consistent set of design constraints, Pareto fronts demonstrating the trade-off between loss and volume for each machine topology are presented and compared.
| Original language | British English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2017 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, ESTS 2017 |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| Pages | 437-444 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781509049448 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 16 Oct 2017 |
| Event | 2017 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, ESTS 2017 - Arlington, United States Duration: 14 Aug 2017 → 17 Aug 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | 2017 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, ESTS 2017 |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | 2017 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, ESTS 2017 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Arlington |
| Period | 14/08/17 → 17/08/17 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Electric ship propulsion
- Machine design
- Multiobjective optimization
- Permanent magnet motors
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of permanent magnet machine topologies for marine propulsion applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver